Buddy Nevins over at BrowardBeat.com hangs a major curve ball -
click here to read his report on
Judge Ana Gardiner's request to be removed as a 2009
Hispanic Woman Of Distinction. According to the article, Ana is paying extra special attention to the
Judicial Canons of Ethics these days, since "
a sanctimonious, largely anonymous crowd of Internet bloggers continue to attack her."
Buddy continues:
"These bloggers close their eyes to the history of lawyers and judges socializing together. I see judges eating lunch with lawyers who practice in their court almost every week, but there is no howling from the legal blogging community. Could it be that Gardiner is a target because she is female and Hispanic? Could it be that the same anti-Hispanic mind-set that drove the defeat of three Hispanic judges last year is part of what’s behind these attacks on Gardiner?
Batter up!
Socializing at lunch? Are you serious, Buddy? Is that really what the Judge was accused of doing, or is it time for you to re-read your good friend
Bob Norman's Judging Ana expose? Did you actually type that line with a straight face? And are your political pals so persuasive that you'll even go along with the playing of the race card to rehabilitate her reputation?
Also - why wasn't the
New Times ever sued, Buddy? Why wasn't a single retraction printed? Are you saying the accusations are false? And why did the Supreme Court award a very expensive new death penalty trial, with
Mike Satz having to concede one of his precious high profile convictions? Oh, and would you want to be tried, or want to have one of your children tried, before a judge who was partying with the prosecutor?
I guess we shouldn't be too hard on Buddy. We love his work, and it's a blog, not a newspaper, where bias is expected. Heck, he even admits at the end of the article that he's friends with Ana. Still, we have to wonder. If he's such a good friend, does he really want to open up that particularly slimy can of worms?
Jay Hurley's Fund Raiser also gets special notice over on
BrowardBeat.com - Buddy also
reported earlier today on the Judge's extraordinary bi-partisan support in his upcoming election bid. Check it out - forces all over Broward County are uniting to support a judge who may have already contributed as much to the health and well-being of our community as any other individual judge. Of course, he's got volume on his side, so don't take it personally if you happen to be another do-gooder judge reading this ...
Eleanor Adderley was back in court today before
Judge Levenson. We weren't there, but we're told
David Bogenschutz announced that the Judge gave a July 13th hearing date to determine whether the case will plea or go to trial.
We think it's a pretty safe bet that this one won't be going to trial (unless they can't find the Chief of Police come the day of the trial), so we'll just have to wait and see if Judge Levenson is going to go along with the anticipated free pass from Satz and company. See the
Sun-Sentinel for more.
Grady Goes To Court - Tuesday at 8:45 before Judge Robinson. What's it all about? Is it early termination of probation time already? Stay tuned ...
Judge Feren Has Feelings Too -
check out the transcript from a hearing last Friday, before he left for his vacation. Apparently, Feren is mighty upset about our "
Fun With Feren" posts (
#1 and #2), so much so that he felt it necessary to launch into a rambling, twelve page refutation of the statements he made on the record about going to trial on misdemeanors.
Make sure you read it. There are some more gems in there, particularly in regard to his tireless efforts that sometimes keep him in court until 4:30 PM (gasp!), and his willingness to accept
no contest pleas, when other Broward judges insist on pleas of
guilty (yup, he says that on pages 6-7, even though we can't think of a single one). Still, he does apologize for his prior comments, and seems to truly believe that the reason he's only had two trials is more the lawyers fault than his own. The Public Defender's Office will be filing an
Amended Motion To Disqualify based on the latest monologue, and, for our part, we'll be taking a good look at the colloquy he gives the children at trial call (with parents in tow), which may be part of the reason why the kids opt for pleas or continuances instead of trial.
What is DEPOTEK? - we don't know for sure, but it's arrived. From now on the Public Defender and the State Attorney will be taking digital electronic depositions, pursuant to stipulation (like in Palm Beach).
Click here to see the memo that went out to the Assistant Public Defenders, explaining how the new system will work.
Will the Courthouse also be able to accomodate private lawyers soon? Wait and see.
It's progress, for sure, but it's too bad so many good stenographers will be hurting for work after the transition is complete.
And on that sad note, we say goodnight ...