Intoxilyzer 8000 Breath Machine

In 2003, after running a comprehensive battery of tests, the great State of Tennessee failed to recommend the Intoxilyzer 8000 for use in that state because "The CMI Intoxilyzer 8000 FAILED to yield satisfactory results on ALL accuracy, precision and performance tests." So, the I 8000 is not good enough for the folks up in Tennessee, but it's good enough to cost innocent people in Florida their freedom, driver's licenses and reputations.
 
Tennessee Rejected I 8000 - Need Letter of Proof of this Rejection.
 
Does anyone have this letter or proof?
 
Thanks.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 1/16/2007 5:02 PM VET wrote:
    Tennessee? White lightning probably blew the damn things up.
  • 1/16/2007 5:57 PM Answer for Vet wrote:
    Vet,
    I envisioned a chain reaction in the lab with a keg of gunpowder somehow misplaced and accidentally going off and blowing up the Intoxilizer from Tennesee and everyone ducking for cover.

    Jeff,
    I'll scour the web later and try to find ya something on that letter.

    Vet, We need to send in some Marines for this mission. The great drinking water of Broward's no good? I disagree with that decision. Distilled water tastes fake to me. I'm used to hallucinations from the tap already.
  • 1/16/2007 9:16 PM Jeff Ivashuk wrote:
    Thanks, I have already gotten a copy of the Rejection letter, test results and other documents.
  • 1/17/2007 1:07 PM JG wrote:
    Any chance we can share the love and get those docs hosted here?
  • 1/17/2007 10:21 PM jeff ivashuk wrote:
    Until we can get them posted, I would be happy to share them with anyone who wants to email me.
  • 1/18/2007 7:59 PM lloyd golburgh wrote:
    ihave the tennessee document if anyone needs it...email me at lloydgolburgh@yahoo.com
  • 1/19/2007 7:41 AM jeff ivashuk wrote:
    Ivashuk@jaablaw.com
  • 1/30/2007 12:30 AM lloyd golburgh wrote:
    this actually happened today: i went to trial last year in front of judge zack in broward on a DUBAL. my client was acquitted by a jury of his peers. kathleen ireland took over zack's division, so i filed a motion to seal, including the certificate of eligibility from the FDLE, with judge ireland. today, my secretary called me on my cell to tell me that judge ireland's JA called and said the motion to seal was denied. when i asked my secretary if the JA gave her a reason, she said the JA told her that the judge "doesn't seal DUIs.' i'm currently awaiting a return call to let me know whether the judge is going to give me a reason for denying a motion to seal on a case where a jury found my client not guilty of breaking the law or at least a hearing on the motion...to be continued.
  • 1/30/2007 2:00 PM Crim Law wrote:
    unbelievable.
  • 2/5/2007 7:01 PM lloyd golburgh wrote:
    Help, Help. i have, 'oh, i didn't use my video camera because.....' dorland, formerly of coconut creed pd tomorrow in trial. i need info on his selective use of the video cam in dui arrests...urgent.
  • 2/7/2007 5:04 PM peter w. kociolek, jr. wrote:
    I would like a copy of the docs. please. Defense attorney in St. Pete Fl. PD office. Thanks.
  • 2/7/2007 5:53 PM J.A.A.B. wrote:
    Please tell us what specific docs you would like and we can ask one of our members to forward them to you.
  • 2/8/2007 7:50 AM Jeff Ivashuk wrote:
    Peter,

    if you will send me your email address at my above listed email, I will be happy to send you all the docs.
  • 7/4/2007 12:41 PM Jackie Ford wrote:
    I would like a copy of the tennessee rejection letter for the intoxilizer 8000. aprofitnow@yahoo.com Thanks, Jackie
  • 10/15/2007 8:18 AM gary knudson wrote:
    need copy of tennessee rejection letter. please help!
  • 10/15/2007 9:39 AM lloyd golburgh wrote:
    gary, i have it and can email it to you...let me know where to send it.
  • 10/15/2007 4:44 PM gary knudson wrote:
    Have not received yet. did you send"?
  • 10/15/2007 4:48 PM gary knudson wrote:
    gknute61@hotmail.com
    please send
    tks
  • 10/15/2007 4:57 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Lloyd:

    Loved your post on Geoffrey Cohen. Too bad the prudes at Jaab took it down because it had swear words in it.

    Keep up the good fight!
  • 10/15/2007 6:42 PM lloyd golburgh wrote:
    thank you anonymous. although i do stand by the post and my opinion of Judge Cohen, i regret the use of the profanity in the post. it was a 'momentary lapse of reason' that detracted from the message. i understood that the post had to be removed because of it.
  • 10/15/2007 6:44 PM lloyd golburgh wrote:
    gary, i sent you the doc. sorry for the delay...had a hearing in west palm with judge paul damico, a real class act, i might add.
  • 10/15/2007 7:13 PM Anonymous wrote:
    that post went away because jeff is friends with seidman who is friends with cohen, not because of swear words. much worse has stayed up on this blog.
  • 10/15/2007 7:44 PM Anonymous wrote:
    i agree, cohen is old school broward (meaning jerk). i just posted urging don cannarozi to run against o'connor in another part of the blog. maybe a nice jewish lady can be found to run cohen out of town too.
  • 10/15/2007 7:58 PM Anonymous wrote:
    That would be great. Imagine the turmoil in the Cohen / Parrish household ... Old Lori would inevitably involve herself and compromise the Appraiser's office ... You get 2 birds with one stone.
  • 10/15/2007 10:36 PM lloyd golburgh wrote:
    as a follow up to the post that was removed, if anyone remembers, it was about Geoffrey Cohen allowing me to set a hearing on a motion that he 'NEVER' grants (to remove a no-contact order that the victim wanted removed because he lives with the victim, is twice her size, and isn't the least bit afraid of her...and testified that way in court). it was about me and my client and an alleged victim taking time out of our day to come to court on a motion that Geoffrey Cohen said, on the record, "i never grant [these] motions...." it was about me complaining to judge geoffrey cohen in a formal letter about his wasting all of our time and him responding that he could care less what the lawyers who practice before him think ("appeal me," he said). it was about his condescending arrogance on display in court for all to see. I BELIEVE HE HAD HIS COURT REPORTER ALTER THE RECORD to exchange the word, "never" (grant motions to withdraw non-contact orders) to 'hardly ever.' unfortunately, or, fortunately for him, the court reporter has no audio file of that hearing. there is no profanity in this post, anonymous, so let's see if you're right about your opinion of the reason the original post was pulled.
  • 10/15/2007 11:49 PM Anonymous wrote:
    http://www.k9news.org/v2i2/images/spacely_mad.jpg
  • 10/15/2007 11:57 PM Anonymous wrote:
    10:49: LOL!

    Check this out:

    http://www.bcpa.net/Images/lori-geoff.jpg
  • 10/16/2007 8:08 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Wow the ADJ goes after Cohen. With friends like ADJ who needs enemies. Going after the wife as well, classy. Maybe the actions of others wives on the public doll should be examined. One thing about Lori she shows up to work everyday, 5 days a week and works a full day.
  • 10/16/2007 8:16 AM Fake Closet Dominatrix wrote:
    I looove going in Cohen's courtroom. All those big strong men shackled up with their big strong arms behind their backs. What a turn on. Makes me feel like a big tough guy. Oooh baby baby.
  • 10/16/2007 8:18 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Would you want to be home with Geoffrey?
  • 10/16/2007 8:35 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Cuffing behind the back always struck me as cruel. What's the point? I'm sure he has his reasons though.
  • 10/16/2007 8:38 AM Anonymous wrote:
    He strikes me as the president of the guilty until proven innocent club. That's probably why he does it.
  • 10/16/2007 6:29 PM Breathalyzer maker fined thousands wrote:
    A Sarasota County court has fined a breathalyzer company $3,200 a day for defying an order to turn over the machine's source code.

    http://www.venicegondolier.com/Newsstory.cfm?pubdate=091907&story=vn1.htm&folder=NewsArchive3
  • 10/16/2007 9:10 PM Because I can wrote:
    http://www.newsday.com/media/photo/2004-05/12508938.jpg
  • 10/16/2007 10:37 PM Anonymous wrote:
    http://school.discoveryeducation.com/clipart/images/judge.gif
  • 10/16/2007 11:40 PM Anonymous wrote:
    http://static.flickr.com/78/216788006_9f785938e0_o.jpg
  • 10/17/2007 8:32 AM Anonymous wrote:
    lol
  • 10/17/2007 8:43 AM Anonymous wrote:
    zero tolerance on profane words, if there are any that you can think of still up, please point it out, the administrator will see that it is removed. thank you for your assistance.

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Comments are closed.