JUDGE ALEMAN ON TRIAL: DECEMBER 4th - BROWARD COURTHOUSE

 
("Anonymous" predicts another one correctly in the comments section)
_______________________________
 
sconway wrote (9/19):
"just spoke to a person at the JQC who said that YES - their trials ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC!"

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 2
  • 9/15/2007 2:54 PM My Pretties wrote:
    http://www.casca.ca/ecass/issues/1998-ME/Avery/witch.jpg
  • 9/15/2007 3:38 PM Anonymous wrote:
    "Anonymous" predicts an Aleman victory...
  • 9/15/2007 4:35 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Anonymous II perdicts a sentence a little worse than Diaz but not removal.
  • 9/15/2007 4:51 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Woul somebody please remove this menace from the bench and set an example for these judges that are out of control? Just how far are you going to let this disgrace spread? Aleman is as bad an example for what a judge should be as I can think of. Toss her to the wolves.
  • 9/15/2007 4:53 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Lock her in the same cell as Diaz and let their hatred of humanity consume each other!
  • 9/15/2007 5:03 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Hope she gets the spike. She stinks as a judge and needs to get taught a lesson. Bogenschutz must really be getting tired of these fools.
  • 9/15/2007 5:38 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Is Bogie going to try it himself?
  • 9/15/2007 5:39 PM Anonymous wrote:
    I can't form an opinion of Aleman on the civil bench----why?----because getting a hearing , even motion calendar, is like pulling teeth. She will kick back your paperwork for any number of reasons, tell you that motion calendar is full etc (and the best part is they don't call to tell you that you can't get on motion calendar, they MAIL you back your documents; in that way you waste 2 weeks. She is impossible. Holmes was the same when she was in civil.
  • 9/15/2007 5:41 PM what she must think wrote:
    http://www.wels.net/wmc/Downloads/210.gif
  • 9/16/2007 12:51 AM In the Glass Darkly wrote:
    Aleman, I am told, is a total uber-christian anti-everything bully. The fact that she held jews in contempt and hangs with her prayer group buddies tells me she's not good bench material. One example is her all too cumfy relationship with Pat Giunta. They seem to share the same prayer beads. It makes me sick thinking about it, if its true.
  • 9/16/2007 8:39 AM She's Not Alone wrote:
    Speaking of total Uber-Christian, anti .....

    Could you imagine being Judge Carol-Lisa Phillips; facing the public knowing you're married to Jim Naugle?

    Thank GOD Aleman and Naugle aren't Mayor/Vice-Mayor. Ft. Lauderdale would be a place NOBODY would want to be.
  • 9/16/2007 10:09 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Maybe Aleman will take a plea. Maybe she will forget a period or comma when she fills the form out and then the JQC will refuse to accept it, and reset the matter for 3 months down the road.
  • 9/16/2007 10:42 AM Anonymous wrote:
    It's the witches basket for the girl that deserves it the most. What a horror.
  • 9/16/2007 10:44 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Well, maybe. Don't forget O'Connor!
  • 9/16/2007 11:50 AM Anonymous wrote:
    I hope this time they give her allot of her own medicine. Like removal for starters. Don't suppose Backman can allow that, not one of our finest judges! What a bad joke
  • 9/16/2007 12:47 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Close, she probably thinks she's more akin to Job though.
  • 9/16/2007 12:50 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Is she being prosecuted for giving massive weekly SPD handouts to her campaign manager and treasurer during her campaign against Malove? If not, why not?
    Is it because huge can of worms would open up if this type of incumbent judicial behavior was investigated?
  • 9/16/2007 1:29 PM Anonymous wrote:
    too bad it takes the jqc to get a crud judge to civil. hopefully tobin won't continue the old trend of dumping the turkeys in criminal.

    sorry civil bros, now you have some spam and gristle to go along with your lobster tails and caviar.
  • 9/17/2007 6:09 AM Anonymous wrote:
    They'll give her back her broom, but she'll have to keep a cleaner house!
  • 9/17/2007 7:14 AM Anonymous wrote:
    I think what Diaz did was more egregious. It was dishonest. Aleman just can't seem to get over herself. She needs a good whack from the JQC to remind her what her role is.
  • 9/17/2007 7:52 AM Anonymous wrote:
    HAHAHAHAHA

    614....The Adjudicator speaks, please you are the only one who would say that.
  • 9/17/2007 8:16 AM Anonymous wrote:
    You cant be serious? Diaz was stupid and sent a dumb anonymous email. If there had been a blog then and he posted it on here anonymously no one would have cared. Aleman has hurt peoples lives. Big difference.

    Must be slow in small claims. I hear there is an earth shattering trial in there today on whether or not a landlord has to pay to unclog a toilet when a tenant tries to flush tapons down the toilet.
  • 9/17/2007 8:26 AM Fake Federal Bureau of Investigations wrote:
    How dare you insinuate that Diaz's email didn't hurt peoples' lives! That email was a threat -- apparently sufficient enough in seriousness that the recipient was in fear for his personal safety (I guess there was a hidden code in the email spelling out the threat if you used your Secret Adjudicator Decoder Ring) and contacted federal authorities to investigate.
  • 9/17/2007 1:42 PM footballer wrote:
    Seeing her raked over the coals, knowing that she'll have to have this hearing in early December and then have it hanging over her head all during the Christmas season brings a smile to my face.
  • 9/17/2007 2:06 PM Anonymous wrote:
    she really was unbelievably nasty when she was a criminal judge
  • 9/17/2007 3:04 PM SEAN CONWAY wrote:
    anyone know if this trial will be open to the public?!

    It will be a genuine "Salem Witch Trial"!!!
  • 9/17/2007 3:05 PM Fake Monty Python wrote:
    A WITCH A WITCH.....BURN HER BURN HER.........

    (I couldnt' resist Sean, I just couldn't).
  • 9/17/2007 3:35 PM Fake Tommy Hillfiger wrote:
    I assume Sean will be in the front row of the gallery to watch the trial. The real question will be how many hours it takes him to select which of his two suits to wear and which man-purse to bring.
  • 9/17/2007 5:25 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Now, that's just good humor. I laughed so hard. Wouldn't it be great if she got a taste of what she dishes out!
  • 9/17/2007 5:31 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Yeah, a super secret judicial decoder ring that would alter your mind and convince you that it was a threat. Oh no, the "Sky is Falling, the Sky is Falling" call the Fake FBI I'm scared!
  • 9/17/2007 6:19 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Dump the witch and make the switch! Very sick woman.
  • 9/17/2007 6:29 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Hope they mop the floor with her. A complete embarrassment to all that have appeared before her. An example of the worst kind of judge and a personal mess.
  • 9/17/2007 7:30 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Bring in the sand bags. It's gonna be a rainy night in Georgia.
  • 9/17/2007 7:51 PM Anonymous wrote:
    if the contents of the diaz email were to be truly considered threatening the stuff said about people on here would be a declaration of war. then again when you are 4'10 most things seem threatening.
  • 9/17/2007 8:04 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Woops, I did it again.
  • 9/17/2007 8:06 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Is he that tall?
  • 9/17/2007 9:03 PM Anonymous wrote:
    she's the 17th's sacrificial lamb. the offer must have been pretty bad. why else go to trial??
  • 9/17/2007 9:37 PM Anonymous wrote:
    "It will be a genuine "Salem Witch Trial"!!!"

    Nah, those women were innocent.
  • 9/17/2007 9:40 PM Anonymous wrote:
    maybe they will open plea based on 921...calling dr. brannon...
  • 9/17/2007 10:21 PM JQC wrote:
    Judge Hauser Retires under pressure:
    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/orl-judge15sep15,0,4227824.story
  • 9/19/2007 9:49 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Raag catches crap for representing Jenne's secretaries, but Dave gets a pass for representing Aleman and Jenne?

Page: 1 of 2
Leave a comment

Comments are closed.