Trackbacks

• Trackbacks are closed for this post.

Comments

• 10/12/2007 10:08 PM get it right wrote:
  Charged with felonious sex with a minor, pled to misdemeanor. Not just arrested.
  
• 10/12/2007 10:48 PM You've got to be F*&KING KIDDING ME wrote:
  Howard's quote of that in hind-sight, it might not have been the best choice to put this guy in Juvenile Court.
  
  Too many comments, too little time.
  
  No kidding Captain Obvious. That would have been like Big Al putting you in charge of drug court the day after you rear-ended that narc.
  
• 10/13/2007 1:45 AM Anonymous wrote:
  Great job JAAB you are one hell of a media organization. Only about 16 hours too late putting up this story.
  
• 10/13/2007 8:44 AM Anonymous wrote:
  Good move Zeidwig! Having fun operating behind the curtain? What happens when your curtain comes down? I'll wait to see the look on your face then.
  
• 10/13/2007 9:44 AM Anonymous wrote:
  bringing up Zeidwig when your boss put a kid who admitted to thinking the girl was 16 when he slept with her, while he was 23, in JUVENILE COURT???
  
  Hypocrites.
  
• 10/13/2007 10:03 AM Anonymous wrote:
  744
  
  Howdy Adjudicator...how is the ice cream social
  
  I think there is a new hit record coming....
  
  Zeidwig, Zeidwig, Zeidwig.....
  
• 10/13/2007 1:05 PM Fake Begging for a Final Decision wrote:
  744
  
  Dear Adjudicator: Please oh please. Stop blogging so much so we can get a special set hearing and case management conference on the flushed kotex case. It has been almost two months with no decision. I know it is a difficult case, but two months after our 45 minute trial, we are still waiting for a decision.
  
  Maybe you can dictate something as you drive back down I-95 tomorrow. Just be sure to put down your ice cream from the hispanic free county fair.
  
• 10/13/2007 3:19 PM BOGENSCHUTZ AND SATZ AGAIN GO FIGURE wrote:
  Clerk's records show Docobo had Bogenschutz. Just like Huizenga's kid who got off with nothing after nearly murdering a 70 year old man with his car on his third DUI.
  
  Boy Satz sure is good to his buddies. I know Bogenschutz is a fine lawyer but something sure smells funny again.
  
  Poor black guys with charges like Huizenga or Docobo go to prison and have their lives destroyed while white guys or rich guys get off if they have one of Satz's buddies.
  
  YOU STINK SATZ WHY DON'T YOU RETIRE AND LEVE THE POOR PEOPLE OF BROWARD ALONE WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF REPENT YOUR SINS YOU HURT COUNTLESS PEOPLE FOR NO REASON AT ALL ON A DAILY BUSINESS
  
  http://www.clerk-17th-flcourts.org/bccoc2/pubsearch/case_summary.asp?hidCaseNumber=05008166CF10A&05008166CF10A=CRM&CACE90029319=CIV&CACE91031914=CIV&FMCE99012272=CIV&FMCE99012272=CIV&CACE90029319=CIV&CACE97000004=CIV&CACE91031914=CIV&CACE97000784=CIV&CACE97000784=CIV&CACE84008363=CIV&00005241CF10A=CRM&00012667CF10C=CRM&01000524CF10A=CRM&01003291CF10A=CRM&01006480CF10A=CRM&01006542CF10A=CRM&01012426CF10A=CRM&01030141MM10A=CRM&02009377CF10A=CRM&txtLastName=DOCOBO&txtFirstName=&txtMiddleInitial=&txtBusinessEntity=&cboCourtType=&chkAdvSearch=&hidSearchType=party_public&hidPageNumber=1&hidSendingPage=search_results&hidCourtType=CRM&hidGeneralType=CRM&hidS=party_public&SearchT=&mscssid=&user_type=&hidPageName=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clerk-17th-flcourts.org%2Fbccoc2%2Fpubsearch%2Fpublic_search.asp%3F&btnSummary=View+Selected+Case
  
• 10/13/2007 4:35 PM Anonymous wrote:
  Interesting. O'Connor was the judge in the interns case. Maybe the Jaab anti-Zeidwig wing will apologize? Or maybe not.
  
• 10/13/2007 5:59 PM Anonymous wrote:
  219
  
  Are you saying that the amount of money a person has could dictate how a case is resolved. I have never heard of such a thing. Its all terrible until your loved one get pinched and you will glady pay Bogey Fred etc to keep them out of jail.
  
• 10/13/2007 9:00 PM Anonymous wrote:
  It's not a far cry from O'Conner to Zeidwig's ears ... and mouth as we have heard.
  
• 10/14/2007 7:05 PM Anonymous wrote:
  O'Connor has no beef with the PD. She gets away with murder primarily because they let her.
  
• 10/15/2007 10:04 PM your office wrote:
  Howard, your employees would like to know why you have fired current employees for much lesser offenses, yet this man, who was not an employee, you give a 'second chance'. (How can you give a second chance to someone who was not an employee to begin with?) We defend those accused of crimes in our office but that does not mean that we want criminals with sex offenses for colleagues. We do not want to work with him. Even if the intern's behavior was not illegal, it shows a pathetic lack of social maturity and behavior for a law student aged **23**. Frankly, we think the hiring of this intern has to be nepotism. Our respect for you has taken a nosedive.
  
• 10/17/2007 12:56 AM don't be a hater - or a faker wrote:
  So, what is it? You refer to him as a criminal, and then you acknowledge that the behavior was not illegal. What's with the "**23**"? Are you saying he wasn't 23? And you don't understand 2nd chances? I don't know, this post doesn't sound like it was written by a criminal defense attorney to me...
  
• 10/17/2007 7:42 AM Recent Former PD wrote:
  Wake up Howie, there must be a reason 1-2 people a week are seen carting their belongings out of your office. Most are quitting not being fired. Lets face it this kid got a job because you cant keep people. Instead of sticking your beak in everyone elses business maybe you ought to see beyond your yes-persons aka "loyal" Assistant Chiefs (take note how quick they throw Al under the bus they will do that to you one day) to see that the indians are restless.
  
• 10/17/2007 11:18 AM HOWARD NEEDS HELP wrote:
  Howard,
  
  I was in court when your intern took his plea and needless to say it was pittiful. A law student knowingly committing stat r ape and taking plea not more than a year ago. The case was broken down because the victim was so embarrassed and wanted to put this behind her. Not cause he was not guilty of the charges filed.
  
  YOU HIRED A PREDATOR TO DEFEND THE VERY PROPLE THAT HE R APED, MINORS.
  
  TALK ABOUT LIABILITY, THE INTERN IS SICK AND SO ARE YOU. HOW WOULD YOU FEEL HOWARD IF HE DEFENDED YOUR MINOR CHILD, WOULD YOU LET HIM. I think not.
  
  YOUR A HYPOCRITE. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GIVING SOMEONE WITH A SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEM A SECOND CHANCE AFTER REHAB than hiring a child predator to work with children. What has this predator done as far as counseling and can you personally assure that he will not do it again.
  
  Then put this predator in a room with your child for 10 minutes and lets see how you feel.
  
  You disgust all parents out there and you are ruining a once proud office.
  
• 10/17/2007 12:07 PM Anonymous wrote:
  Don't you think that you are overreacting a bit?? The case was most likely broken down b/c the State had a weak case (ie: sex was consensual; all. vict had a history of sexual activity.....). when does the State ever break down a case b/c the alleged vict was "embarrassed"- what a joke- you have obviously never handled these types of cases!!!
  
• 10/17/2007 1:13 PM Fake PD Memo wrote:
  MEMO
  To: All Chief APDs
  From: Your Feckless Leader
  __________________________________
  
  Dammit people. Get to BLOGGING ASAP. I'm being attacked for assigning this post-grad intern to juvie court. How dare these critics compare me negatively to Big Al!!! I'm just doing what Al did for me.....giving someone a second chance. How can they claim there is no difference between someone with a substance abuse problem and someone who thinks horny 16 year olds are fair game. Both are addictions for goodness sakes.
  
  First Chief to post 50 blogs gets a free pass on Sunday Jail Visits for a Month. GET CRACKING PEOPLE!!!!
  
• 10/17/2007 1:36 PM i'm not satz wrote:
  was she hot?
  
• 10/17/2007 5:59 PM shayna wrote:
  I am in my teens and like older guys. dad is cool with it. Hey Docobo call me. hugz
  
• 10/17/2007 7:00 PM Anonymous wrote:
  I'm amazed that an APD would be afraid of this intern working in the PD's office. Most criminal defense attorneys understand the difference between a child predator and a young man having voluntary sex with a person they believe is 16, looks the part, but lied about their age. While that may show an incredible lack of judgment, it should not disqualify the young man from pursuing a career as an attorney. PD's spend their careers defending good people who make mistakes, as well as bad people who keep repeating them. There is a difference. Just because the legislature has lumped all so called sex offenders into the same category and makes so little distinction between a real child predator and a young man having voluntary sex with a 15 year old who lies about her age, doesn't mean defense attorneys have to fall into the same trap. If an APD is really not comfortable working next to this intern, then perhaps it's time for that attorney to look elsewhere for a job.
  
• 10/17/2007 7:46 PM Fake PD Memo Follow-up wrote:
  TO: Anonymous 6:00pm
  From: All Hail King Howie
  _____________________________________
  Thank you for following my directive and that of your Chief APD and posting in my defense. While all bonuses have been canceled, I was able to sell on Ebay some old bottles of mocha mudslide mix from the former daiquiri machine storage room. Your $37.23 bonus will be forwarded to you immediately.
  
  Also, your Sunday jail visit quota for October and November will be filled by an intern who owes me big time for saving his behind.
  
• 10/17/2007 8:39 PM soon-to-be-ex-APD wrote:
  Hey, Howard, I'll be leaving soon. Why don't you assign all of my sex cases to your intern. Or better yet - he's probably familiar w/ all those internet sites that FDLE is going after - he could represent all the creeps looking for underage teenage girls.
  
• 10/18/2007 6:57 AM Anonymous wrote:
  Hey soon be be ex-APD, aka Sprinkles: Time to stop impersonating APD's and time to go to court & pretend to be a judge.
  

Leave a comment

Comments are closed.