THE JAABLOG QUEENS OF CONTEMPT

             
                Judge Eileen O'Connor                 Judge Cheryl Aleman      Judge Marina Garcia-Wood
                        (Sentinel)                                        (Sentinel)                                      (DBR)

             The "Jury Duty Kid": 4 Months     Attorney Adam Katz: 2 Months      Victoria Sando: 6 Months


*Notice to all interested judges: to qualify as a "Queen of Contempt" or a "King of Contempt," you must sentence an unsuspecting party to a jail term of at least thirty days.  Subsequent mitigation or appellate nullification shall have no bearing on your crown, once conferred.



 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 1/11/2008 12:42 AM Bonnie Russell wrote:
    Pikers all.

    Here's a couple of 'winners' from USAjudges.com:

    In the case of Nebraska judge who said no prison for the short (5'1") convicted child molester
    http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/05/25/local/doc4474ed34cdca3829136003.txt

    USAjudges.com revealed Judge Kristine Cecava was no maverick judge. She served as past president of the Nebraska Judges Association. But more shockingly, on the 'Task Force' to protect children.
    http://www2.csc.edu/eyh/speaker/speaker2000.asp

    and the husband-wife tag team,
    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20070609-9999-1m9fraud.html
  • 1/11/2008 8:14 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Prediction come true: Not one newspaper article about Judge Marina Garcia Wood and her antics. What does that say? Remember when this happened to Goldstein? The media doesn't really care about what's going on. As a matter of fact, they're part of the problem. That's why we have things like this continue.
  • 1/11/2008 8:27 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Judge fudge and Buns joins the pantheon of immortals. What a crew.
  • 1/11/2008 10:17 AM Anonymous wrote:
    How did that jury duty kid, end up. I'm sure any half decent lawyer was able to override that injustice - right?
  • 1/11/2008 11:21 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Docket Trak shows he's in prison on 2 burglaries. I guess contempt of court was the least of his problems.
  • 1/11/2008 11:51 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Wonder about the quality of Broward Judges that don't seem to know much about the law.
  • 1/11/2008 5:43 PM Anonymous wrote:
    So did Billy-boy represent the Jury Duty Kid on the 2 burgs he is in prison for?

    Did he try the cases (yah right)?

    Or did he like usual just try to get the judge to downward depart and get his hat handed to him?
  • 1/11/2008 7:44 PM Anonymous wrote:
    love the pics--they look so glamorous.
  • 1/12/2008 9:12 AM Dead Heat for First wrote:
    Looks like Cheryl is doing a little tipping of the cocktail glass these days. O'Connor has always looked that way. Three big winners of who's trying to be the biggest fool in the courthouse if you as me. Right now they're in a dead heat for first prize.
  • 1/12/2008 9:44 AM Do Blonds have more Fun wrote:
    Definite losers in the long run. And two of them are blonds! Guess they're trying to compete with one another.
  • 1/12/2008 9:57 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Definitely O'Connor and Aleman are neck and neck.
  • 1/12/2008 11:23 AM Don for Judge wrote:
    Comeo on Don run against Oconnor you will knock her out and everything around here will change when the judges see they can be an incumbant and lose
  • 1/12/2008 1:10 PM King of Contempt? wrote:
    Latent anti-woman bias in JAAB? (Given the leadership, the dislike of women is not surprising).

    Why is it that the BILLog and MARlog and JEFFlog are not focusing on the fact that the so called "contempt expert", CJ Vicky, gave his explicit ok to what G-W did in that secret judge's meeting last weekend, which meeting included input from the ADJ himself.

    G-W is a "queen of contempt" but given the approval of her conduct by the ADJ and CJ, they must certainly be kings of contempt.
  • 1/12/2008 1:10 PM Anonymous wrote:
    I second that emotion.
  • 1/12/2008 1:11 PM Missing from the List wrote:
    How can any list of "queens of contempt" be complete without including MW?
  • 1/12/2008 11:23 PM You're Wrong wrote:
    1/11/2008 7:14 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Prediction come true: Not one newspaper article about Judge Marina Garcia Wood and her antics. What does that say? Remember when this happened to Goldstein? The media doesn't really care about what's going on. As a matter of fact, they're part of the problem. That's why we have things like this continue.
    ========
    You must not read a paper all the way. Sun-Sentinel ran the story the day after it happened.
  • 1/13/2008 3:22 AM Anonymous wrote:
    but they never ran a story when she got released
  • 1/13/2008 1:46 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Does anyone know of any male judges who have banged up anyone for contempt of court?
  • 1/13/2008 2:04 PM david lindsey wrote:
    reporters get their news tips from judges so they are very careful about to much criticism. why didn't the police or the media follow up with judge hauser in orlando after retiring because of his masturbating in front of one of his students. i was in maria's court rm when she sentenced a man to 30 yrs for being drunk and masturbating in front of children. hauser retires and takes his pension. there's justice for u.
  • 1/13/2008 3:05 PM Anonymous wrote:
    12:46 P.M.: Yes, you need to check out Judge Seidman, who likes to threaten incarceration when litigants cannot pay judgments. Holds hearings, makes certain that everyone has been served but threatens incarceration without findings of ability to pay and without setting a purge amount. Also witnessed him threaten jail to defendant in civil case who did not answer discovery. The man was crying, saying he was a registered nurse who had to take care of his ailing father and he begged for several minutes not to go to jail. Judge watched this go on and then said, ok, go to this attorney's office and answer discovery and you won't have to go to jail. Just watch anything scheduled in front of him as a Motion for Contempt.
    Let's not forget in criminal how he like to have people handcuffed for being late for hearings. He did this to a defendant who was not late at all and had been present the whole time and whose lawyer stepped out (after being there for the first call-up). Judge got confused and thought the client was late. Nice humiliation for a decent guy (the defendant).
  • 1/13/2008 3:23 PM anonymous wrote:
    The Sentinel endorsed M G-W, yet they wrote a derogatory article about her right before her robing last year. They wrote about her failure to use her true name when running.... she ran as an hispanic but removed the name GARCIA from the ballot even though that had been her name for over twenty years. (But she has subsequently gone back to using it....not sure she ever stopped using it). They didn't report this before the election.... why not tell the voters? Why did they wait until she was elected to criticize her? I don't recall any of the major papers reporting that she had the lowest bar poll results as a magistrate either. The papers tend to inflame inorder to sell their wares and then leave out details that might hurt them.
  • 1/13/2008 3:49 PM Anonymous wrote:
    How about when Goldstein had the female lawyer thrown out (by BSO) for wearing "culotte skirt"?? How about Judge Wright briefly jailing a PD for asking a question too many times?or Tyson/Coker holding Sandstrom in contempt for not wearing a tie??
  • 1/13/2008 5:41 PM Anonymous wrote:
    249

    Sadly those who complain around here were not around to see when things were much worse. They think that world began when this blog wass created.
  • 1/13/2008 6:23 PM Anonymous wrote:
    To 4:41 p.m.: Does that mean we have to keep silent, just because things were much worse in the past? Possibly, some of our current judges think that they are enlightened, just because they are better than some who came before them. I believe that some of them actually READ this blog and learn from it. So, keep blogging everyone.
  • 1/13/2008 11:59 PM Anonymous wrote:
    All the old dipsticks will be disappearing in the next few years and their proteges will be marginalized. The young blog generation judges will be running the show soon, like grown-ups as opposed to narcissists with low self-esteem.
  • 1/14/2008 7:32 AM Jason Straight wrote:
    Please dont send these folks to the civil division..What happened to sensitivity training..
  • 1/14/2008 8:53 AM Anonymous wrote:
    "young blog generation judges will be running"????

    That's pretty laughable, given that they know that no matter their reasons for running or their intelligence, heart or qualifications, they will be ripped to shreds by the jealous judge-wannabes on this blog.

    The only thing this blog will be doing is DISCOURAGING people for running for judge.
  • 1/15/2008 12:10 AM Gum gum dum dum wrote:
    Maybe doin' a super sweet double team on Adam Katz wasn't such a smart idea, what do you say dum dums? Man, talk about you're gonna burn those rich kids, why don't you just calm down,sorry, I forgot you was super dum dums, too stupid to apologize, dum dums. Or maybe you took, or followed, super bum advice from the supposed cool kids who kept gettin' evryone in trouble without hiding the fact they was dum dums? Way uncool, dude! Hey dude, what the freakin' heck is goin' on, you dum dums?
  • 1/15/2008 12:32 AM Hey Marina wrote:
    You the only one who looks good in the pictures baby!
  • 1/16/2008 10:20 AM Judge Woody wrote:
    Yeah, to bad you're not acquainted with the law.
  • 1/16/2008 10:26 AM david lindsey wrote:
    when did judges follow the law, i settle for common sense

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Comments are closed.