CASES - Civil
Torts -- Automobile accident -- Injuries to minor -- Action against caretaker on behalf of minor injured in
automobile accident alleging caretaker breached common law duty to use reasonable care in caring for child by
failing to use proper child passenger restraint -- Statute stating that “[t]he failure to provide and use a
child passenger restraint shall not be considered comparative negligence, nor shall such failure be admissible as
evidence in the trial of any civil action with regard to negligence” does not prohibit introduction of any
evidence of the failure to provide and use a proper child passenger restraint in a negligence action brought by an
injured child against a caretaker who allegedly failed to secure the child in such a device prior to the automobile
accident that caused the injuries -- Statute interpreted as prohibiting evidence of comparative negligence and
evidence of negligence that may be similarly used to reduce an injured child's recovery -- Court rejects
defendant's contention that statute is, in essence, a grant of
immunity
Reported at
33 Fla. L. Weekly D517a
Courtesy of Florida Law Weekly Subscriptions (800) 351-0917

Comments