4 on 17
Posted by Jeffrey Ivashuk at 2/20/2008 12:10 PM 
Categories: Burnstein, Aleman, WilliamsElijah, Aramony, Luzzo, Carney, Weinstein, Cases-Civil, Holmes, Cases, Seigel
Categories: Burnstein, Aleman, WilliamsElijah, Aramony, Luzzo, Carney, Weinstein, Cases-Civil, Holmes, Cases, Seigel
Aramony Affirmed & remand 4D05-4589-Pineiro v. Law Firm of Franklin
& Criscuolo
Holmes Reversed & remand 4D06-409-Baptiste v. Fermenic
Luzzo Reversed & remand 4D06-409-Baptiste v. Fermenic
Carney Affirm in part, Reverse in part 4D06-915-Kravitz v. Levy
Weinstein Affirm & remand 4D06-4291-Perry v. State*
Burnstein Affirmed 4D06-4422-Cardillo v. Qualsure Insurance Corporation
Siegel Reverse & remand 4D07-336-State v. Powell
Aleman Writ of hab granted 4D07-1555-Watson v. State
Williams Reverse & remand 4D07-2137-C.B., a child v. State
Holmes Reversed & remand 4D06-409-Baptiste v. Fermenic
Luzzo Reversed & remand 4D06-409-Baptiste v. Fermenic
Carney Affirm in part, Reverse in part 4D06-915-Kravitz v. Levy
Weinstein Affirm & remand 4D06-4291-Perry v. State*
Burnstein Affirmed 4D06-4422-Cardillo v. Qualsure Insurance Corporation
Siegel Reverse & remand 4D07-336-State v. Powell
Aleman Writ of hab granted 4D07-1555-Watson v. State
Williams Reverse & remand 4D07-2137-C.B., a child v. State
Mr. Watson was Pro-se, he did not do a bad job for himself. Why would the appellant office of the P.D. not represent him?