CASES
Reported at 33 Fla. L. Weekly D833a
Criminal law -- Evidence -- Hearsay -- Testimonial out-of-court
statements -- Statements of burglary and battery victim who has died --
Deceased victim's statements to police officer who arrived at victim's
home shortly after burglary were inadmissible under U.S. Supreme Court decision in Crawford v. Washington
because they were testimonial out-of-court statements by a witness
unavailable for cross-examination -- Statements to officer were
testimonial because there was no ongoing emergency at time officer
interviewed victim, and officer was interviewing victim to ascertain
facts necessary to establish criminal activity, assist in further
investigation, and further possible future prosecution -- Victim's
statement that she had been robbed, made while calling for help, is
admissible because it is an excited utterance and is non-testimonial --
Statements made by victim to her son when he first arrived at victim's
house after burglary are admissible as excited utterances because the
primary purpose of the statements was not testimonial, but to relate to
a close family member what had happened to garner assistance and support
Reported at 33 Fla. L. Weekly D874b
Criminal law -- Lewd or lascivious conduct on victim less than 16
years old by offender 18 years old or older -- Evidence -- Trial court
erred by prohibiting defense counsel from proffering minor victim's
testimony regarding a prior accusation of sexual assault she made
against another man -- Error was not harmless -- Fact that victim had
not recanted prior allegation does not preclude defense counsel from
inquiring concerning that allegation -- No error in denying defendant's
motion in limine regarding defendant's conduct in text messaging,
tickling, and telling victim to “‘take it out in trade” -- These acts
were not evidence of collateral crimes, but were relevant evidence
admissible as part of, or inextricably intertwined with, the crime
charged
Reported at 33 Fla. L. Weekly D868a
Criminal law -- Sale of cocaine and marijuana within 1000 feet of
school and public housing facility -- Evidence presented by state
failed to establish prima facie case of guilt where police could
testify only that they saw what they believed to be a hand-to-hand
transaction and that defendant had received some amount of cash from
driver in one exchange -- Although drugs were found in particular car,
and police had observed an encounter and possible transaction between
defendant and car's driver, there was no evidence linking drugs to
defendant or limiting the possible source of the drugs found in the car
-- Error to deny motion for judgment of acquittal -- Remand with
instructions that defendant be discharged
Reported at 33 Fla. L. Weekly D858a
Criminal law -- Search and seizure -- Residence -- Consent --
Voluntariness -- Consent to search by defendant after several officers
approached defendant's residence at 3:00 a.m. to conduct a “knock and
talk” interview, officers made initial contact with defendant by means
of a ruse, and defendant was advised of Miranda rights --
Trial court properly found that under totality of circumstances state
met burden of establishing that consent was voluntary -- Circumstance
that encounter between police and defendant takes place in middle of
the night does not militate strongly toward conclusion that ensuing
consent was involuntary -- Consent was not negated by ruse employed by
police to initiate contact with residents -- Number of officers present
did not have coercive impact on defendant -- Giving of Miranda warning to defendant did not indicate that he had been taken into custody
Reported at 33 Fla. L. Weekly D854c
Reported at 33 Fla. L. Weekly D865a
Criminal law -- Murder -- Death penalty -- Post conviction relief -- Appeal from order denying successive rule 3.851 motion and order concluding that defendant is not mentally retarded under rule 3.203 -- Pursuant to statute and rule, defendant must prove mental retardation by demonstrating significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior which manifested during period from conception to age 18 -- Competent, substantial evidence supported circuit court's conclusion that defendant failed to prove any of these factors by clear and convincing evidence
Reported at 33 Fla. L. Weekly S219a
Courtesy of Florida Law Weekly Subscriptions (800) 351-0917

What's the cryptic message with the video? Is somebody going somewhere?
Guys at my high school would write cryptic messages all the time, it was no big deal.