SUN SENTINEL BIOS & UNABRIDGED CANDIDATE INTERVIEWS



Dijols/Bober/Levey
    Goldenberg/Mollica    Howes/Eichner/Ehrlich

Feren/Rickard/Sugar    Gonzalez/Feld    Avalos/Richards    Wennet/Abramson

Roshawn Banks, et al    Finkelstein/Arreaza

                              ALL THIS AND MORE FOR A LOW $5,803.20 FILING FEE!

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 2
  • 7/27/2008 10:52 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Hey there's no picture of Sir Ian Richards. I wonder why?
  • 7/28/2008 7:13 AM snickers wrote:
    performing seals are better than this bunch. At least they can balance a ball!
  • 7/28/2008 9:12 AM War Chest wrote:
    I heard BACDL is coming into its own. The war chest idea has been around forever. Everyone chips in and raises the filing fee. That way the really bad judges get opponents. They may not beat the incumbent but the Dijols effect will be guaranteed. When they have to work to keep their jobs they become good judges. It's uncanny.
  • 7/28/2008 10:18 AM War Chest --- Not so much.... wrote:
    If all BACDL can raise is enough to get a warm body a $6,000.00 filing fee, we're in worse shape than I could have ever imagined.

    Instead of having BACDL fund filing fees for a couple of candidates, how about they pick one race they really want to be involved in and get their membership behind that one person. There are members of BACDL who can't give $500.00 to 5 or 10 people, but can only pony up $500 or $1,000 (if you give individually and through your PA).

    Maybe that way you can actually put $20k or $25k behind one person against one bad judge, instead of putting up dead losers against 2 or 3.

    The only problem with the "war chest" theory is that the BACDL's history shows they can't get UNIFIED AGAINST ANYONE OR ANYTHING.

    No matter how much was raised for one candidate running against a sitting judge, you would have the BACDL membership still giving in equal if not greater amounts to the incumbent the "war chest candidate" is running against.

    How many BACDL members have donated to Bernie Bober's campaign vs. donating to Pedro Dijols?

    For all the lawyers who complain and piss and moan about a particular judge -- in the end, like an abused child, they will run back and do whatever they can to get their abuser's love.
  • 7/28/2008 10:32 AM War Chest? More like a roll of pennies wrote:
    Sorry, no war chest for BACDL -- all their money has been spent donating to the incumbents they claim to want defeated.
  • 7/28/2008 10:41 AM anonymous wrote:
    Goldenberg is such a hypocrite. Too bad she doesn't practice what she preaches.
  • 7/28/2008 11:52 AM Dreamers wrote:
    The problem is BACDL is controlled by Satzists. The former prosecutors who now defend for money - simple mercenaries. They like and agree with Satz's kill 'em all philosophy - in fact, they know its good for business, karma be dmaned. They won't buck him or the incumbent judges who support Satz to the hilt. An example - why did it take the JQC to rid us of Aleman? Where was BACDL besides running her campaign? Quit dreaming about a war chest - not gonna happen.
  • 7/28/2008 5:04 PM Anonymous wrote:
    At least we have a few choices.
  • 7/28/2008 5:27 PM to 10:18 wrote:
    Well said.!
  • 7/28/2008 10:10 PM The Ghost of 2008 wrote:
    The Ghost will provide the most as the 2008 Broward County Sheriff"s Race Host:

    "Shaq" Dangi is in deep doodo with the Florida Elections Commission and State Law Enforcement authorities over some alleged bounced checks, alleged mortgage fraud issues, and recent allegations regarding a $500.00 payment purportedly made to Plantation Democratic Club President, Bill Kling. Bill is a political/military veteran who allegedly received a payment from a Dangi surrogate as an "alleged payoff" for his club"s support. Simply review the recent "New Times article at www.browardnewtimes.com.

    Mr. Udolf, who worked as a Special Prosecutor for Rep. Kenneth Starr (allegedly was involved with the dna/dress issue and was asked to leave Starr's employ because of philosophical differences, ie...he was depressed) has been also under fire for keeping an innocent man in jail for a long period of time resulting in a large settlement for false arrest/detention - Udolf denies the allegations.

    The Barbara Miller (she managed Ron Cochran's campaign) Lemak machine lacks the punch necessary to win in August or November 2008. He is currently employed as a numbers cruncher/city manager with the City of Hollywood. He spent a short time as Deputy Police Chief of the Hollywood police Department.

    Wiley Thompson claims to be an FBI/G-Man leader with loads of experience, however, he admitted Jenne fired him during an interview with the Sun-Sentinel but now has changed his tune to include the phrase:"my position was illuminated after Ken Jenne resigned from office" The Ghost believes Mr. Thompson was hired by Jenne to help cover Jenne"s political tracks during the pending FBI/Federal Investigation against the former sheriff. Who knows? However, Wiley Thompson"s Tennessee Bankruptcy is all there to see in black and white. Just go to the Tennessee Federal Bankruptcy Court computer system to get a look see for yourself.

    Scott Israel has the most experience and is the only candidate currently employed as a police officer. (Police Chief of North Bay Village) Scott has extensive law enforcement training/background. He retired from the Fort Lauderdale Police Dept. as a Captain. (SWAT, Canine, Drug Unit Community Policing) He has approximately 10 IA Reports which were all unfounded/not sustained. Scott has raised the most money and his name speaks for itself. Oy!!!

    Ghost Predicts:

    Israel: 52%

    Lemak: 21%

    Udolf: 10%

    Shaq: 5%

    Thompson: 12%

    "Republican Lame-Birdie" will lose the general - similar to the fate of all Broward Republicans.

    Over-in-Out

    Ghost of 2008

    VOTE AUGUST 26, 2008

    EARLY VOTING STARTS AUGUST 11, 2008
  • 7/29/2008 6:15 PM Shaq's Back wrote:
    Shaq was that guy Ross used as a PR man, remember? He didn't do a very good job at that either. He's just looking for a job. It's a joke really.
  • 8/4/2008 4:49 PM Jack Thompson, Attorney wrote:
    Jack Thompson vindicated:

    http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article4457144.ece
  • 8/4/2008 7:00 PM Sortableturnip wrote:
    Jack Thompson, soon to be disbarred

    http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/07/09/we-have-judge039s-report-recommending-permanent-disbarment-jack-thompson
  • 8/5/2008 12:50 AM HarmlessBunny wrote:
    Hey Jack, even if the Thai government and police force are not lying through their teeth...I remember you telling me on that radio broadcast that one person claimed not to be affected by video games would be an insignificant statistic. Ironically there are over 50 million gamers out now a days...and growing! What is one murder based on a game from a sick kid who wanted more cash and decided to rob a cabby, out of millions? Do the math, genius. Perhaps you might learn something?
  • 8/5/2008 1:53 AM ArreazaFilesLawsuit wrote:
    I believe Arreaza is filing the lawsuit against Finkelstein this morning at 11am. Stay tuned. I hear it's the first of 2 salvos this week.
  • 8/5/2008 6:18 AM Areazza's Folly wrote:
    Well, you didn't think he was going to be talking about his platform for the PD's Office or what Ross' proposed plans are for a new PD's Office, or the reason Areazza has no signs out there, or why Areazza is no longer campaigning? Really sad stuff if you ask me. And all this you say before his political camp caves in on him? Who said this was his idea anyway? Yeah, right.
  • 8/5/2008 12:05 PM ArreazaFilesLawsuit wrote:
    You're right, Arreaza's signs aren't everywhrere. But then again, I haven't seen any Finkelstien signs up either. Wonder what that means.
    Nontheless, the lawsuit is proper.
    As for his political camp caving in... nope. Sorry bud. They show no signs of having any problems or contention. They are not hiding their candidate like Finkelstein's camp is. As you will soon find out.
  • 8/5/2008 12:11 PM inevitable wrote:
    It looks like the only one hiding is Areazza, from the inevitable, by the looks of it, suit or no suit, as you will see!
  • 8/5/2008 2:30 PM Anonymous wrote:
    The only one that doesn't get it is him.
  • 8/5/2008 2:54 PM tom wrote:
    the only ones who don't understand the hidden costs of the epidemic of judicial corruption are.......... brooke kennerly of the JQC and john harkness , et al of THE BAR organized crime ring.
  • 8/5/2008 3:37 PM three strikes wrote:
    Areazza won't get 2 percent of the vote. This being his third try at politics, it spells the end for his political career. Three strike plan coming soon.
  • 8/5/2008 7:34 PM complaints with merit wrote:
    The lawsuits concerning finkelstein have merit. It is just at this point the agencies in broward county have interpreted them to be politically motivated, it is a gutless position, but it gives the local elected officials cover in their own rationalization for their own inactivity. Arezza good luck
  • 8/5/2008 8:54 PM Groundless wrote:
    Meritless, groundless and politically motivated is indeed the substance of any suit that would be brought by Areazza. We've all seen this type of crap before. It's what he's been put up to do. Face it.
  • 8/5/2008 9:25 PM Sleepy Blog wrote:
    So other than case updates (what do you think this place is, educational????), Crazy Arreaza Hate Howard Posts, and 9 billion Thompson-related items, what's up with the blog?

    There's judicial races to comment on and arguably the most powerful elected official in Broward is going to be selected soon -- nothing here about that stuff.

    Come on guys, you can do better.
  • 8/6/2008 12:07 AM HowardGetsSued wrote:
    Interesting how you gutless worms criticize Arreaza for filing a lawsuit against Finkelstein and no one has bothered to read it. I did, this afternoon. Not only dose it have merit, but it may show theft of public funds and corruption in private attorney assignments. You guys need to read up on things to make an informed comment you know otherwise you sound like blithering idiots.
  • 8/6/2008 12:12 AM Anonymous wrote:
    I read the lawsuit against Howard and looks like Arreaza covered his bases pretty good. I think he may have a viable argument.
  • 8/6/2008 12:14 AM Anonymous wrote:
    I can hear it now. Mr. Finkelstein, would you please explain to the court how a $90 per hour charge can add up to $101,000 in fees for a simple public records request regarding the help me howard ballerina show?
  • 8/6/2008 12:15 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Yessssss..... I'm a terrifying terrorist......

    signed, Mr. Shadow.
  • 8/6/2008 12:17 AM Anonymous wrote:
    You racist baztard.

    SILENCE!!!

    I keel you!
  • 8/6/2008 12:18 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Mr. Finkelstein, please stand up when you are addresing the audience.

    Oh, sorry.
  • 8/6/2008 12:20 AM Anonymous wrote:
    "Hey man, that is an ugly pimple on your backside!"

    "That's not a pimple! it's my boss Howie."
  • 8/6/2008 12:21 AM Anonymous wrote:
    "So if that's Howie, what's the puss?"

    "Oh, that's Kathy and Frankie ooozing all over themselves."

Page: 1 of 2
Leave a comment

Comments are closed.