DOES HILLARY KNOW BEST?

                                                            There has been escalating talk recently as to whether Obama or McCain were qualified to be President under the Natural Born Citizen requirement in Article 2.  McCain, even though he was not born in the Continental United States, his birth to American born parents while in the Panama Canal Zone qualifies him.  Obama on the other hand has been reluctant to release his birth certificate until recently.  The birth certificate he released shows that he was born in Hawaii. 

     Everyone knows that the Clinton's have crack investigators who will find it if it's out there.  Everyone also knows that Hillary has not released her delegates.  Hillary may simply be holding her delegates so she can continue to raise money for her campaign and pay off debt.  Or, could the Clinton's know something and holding back for the right moment?

     Upon release of the certificate by the Obama camp on June 12, it was posted on the internet.  An Israeli daily newsmagazine, the "israelinsider", issued an article on June 24th headlining, "Unstamped certificate suggests Obama may not be "natural born" US citizen.  Then four days ago, the israelinsider published the following article, Claim: Obama's "birth certificate" forged with sister Maya's original.

     Is this a big hoax or will this month turn out to be a very interesting one.  Review the articles and decide for yourself.  I'm sure there will be more to follow.

June 24: 

August 5: 
 

    

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 8/9/2008 3:54 PM JackDon'tKnowJack wrote:
    The 4th Amendment, while doing much to ensure that persons and property remain free from unwarranted government arrest, search, and seizure, does very little with respect to creating the requirement that the Presindent of the United States be a natural-born U.S. citizen. That requirement is created by Art. I, Sec. 2 of the Constitution.
  • 8/9/2008 4:13 PM Anonymous wrote:
    thnx for pointing out my typo
  • 8/9/2008 4:17 PM JackDon'tKnowJack wrote:
    You're quiet welcome. I figured it was the Freudian slip of a criminal defense lawyer and not a lack of knowledge.
  • 8/9/2008 6:40 PM Anonymous wrote:
    I won't even comment on the "quite" and "quiet" error there. Ok, I guess I just did.
  • 8/9/2008 7:33 PM JackDon'tKnowJack wrote:
    If your gonna take it there, take it there. "Presindent?" And it aint "Art. I, Sec. 2." It's Art. II, Sec. 1"
  • 8/9/2008 8:38 PM Anonymous wrote:
    It's official. Arreaza was put up by two groups: the American Hispanic Caucus and the American Black Caucus. the black caucus is run by a longtime political hack named Andrew Lewis. The hispanic caucus is run by some guy i've never heard of, but it seemed that he was running the show. Anybody know eho these guys are?
    I saw his handlers there today and they happened to be the sponsors of the BBQ at the rodeo in davie.
    Give it up Arreaza, even these two boobs can't help your lame campaign.
  • 8/9/2008 11:16 PM Anonymous wrote:
    WHERE IS THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE ???

    In case you have not seen this--this would surely upset the apple cart.



    According to Pat Shannan, (assistant editor, American Free Press, July 7, 2008) it now appears that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible for the office of president. John McCain's eligibility was established in 1964, when courts ruled Sen. Barry Goldwater was eligible although he was born in Arizona when it was a territory, not a state. McCain was born in the Panama Canal Z one when it was a U.S. territory.
    And, even as the controlled media continues to ignore the ineligibility of Obama, it will not go away. While few doubt that the Democrats will manage to pull off his nomination, all remain poised to view the legal performance.

    The first hurdle will be having Obama produce his birth certificate, which so far he has refused to do, and prove that he was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961, as he has always claimed. There is speculation that his American mother may have brought him to Honolulu shortly after his birth in Kenya , but no proof of that has been shown.

    According to the law on the books at the time of Obama's birth, the office of president requires th at a candidate be a natural born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. citizen parents. Since he was not, should it be proven that Obama was not born in Hawaii , as claime d, he is ineligible without further debate. But assuming that he was born there, he has another problem.

    According to a legal researcher who has contacted AFP , U.S. law very clearly states: 'If only one parent is a U.S. citizen at the time of one's birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for a minimum of 10 years, five of which must be after the age of 16.' And therein lies Obama's new problem.

    Barack Obama's father was never a U.S. citizen. Interestingly, there isn't much paperwork on the marriage of Obama's parents, and this has a few researchers speculating that it never took place at all. On page 27 of Obama: From Promise to Power, David Mendell writes: 'Obama later confessed that he never searched for the government documents on the marriage, although Madelyn (Obama's maternal grandmother) insisted they were legally married.' He also notes tha t Obama's father apparently was not legally divorced from his first wife back in Kenya at the time, a point of contention that ultimately led to their separation.


    This also would suggest that there may never have been any legal marriage by Obama's parents at all, but the Constitution does not ban an illegitimate child from the White House, as long as he was born inside the U.S. Obama's mother was born in Kansas and was only 18 when Obama was born. This means even though she satisfies the citizen requirement for 10 years, she was not a citizen for at least five years prior to Barack Obama's birth.

    In essence, the mother alone is not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. citizenship. At most, two years elapsed from his mo
  • 8/9/2008 11:19 PM Anonymous wrote:
    WHERE IS THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE ???

    In case you have not seen this--this would surely upset the apple cart.



    According to Pat Shannan, (assistant editor, American Free Press, July 7, 2008) it now appears that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible for the office of president. John McCain's eligibility was established in 1964, when courts ruled Sen. Barry Goldwater was eligible although he was born in Arizona when it was a territory, not a state. McCain was born in the Panama Canal Z one when it was a U.S. territory.
    And, even as the controlled media continues to ignore the ineligibility of Obama, it will not go away. While few doubt that the Democrats will manage to pull off his nomination, all remain poised to view the legal performance.

    MORE TO FOLLOW
  • 8/9/2008 11:22 PM Anonymous wrote:
    According to Pat Shannan, (assistant editor, American Free Press, July 7, 2008) it now appears that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible for the office of president. John McCain's eligibility was established in 1964, when courts ruled Sen. Barry Goldwater was eligible although he was born in Arizona when it was a territory, not a state. McCain was born in the Panama Canal Z one when it was a U.S. territory.
    And, even as the controlled media continues to ignore the ineligibility of Obama, it will not go away. While few doubt that the Democrats will manage to pull off his nomination, all remain poised to view the legal performance.

    The first hurdle will be having Obama produce his birth certificate, which so far he has refused to do, and prove that he was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961, as he has always claimed. There is speculation that his American mother may have brought him to Honolulu shortly after his birth in Kenya , but no proof of that has been shown
  • 8/9/2008 11:29 PM the Silver Mullet wrote:
    give it up Jeff.

    Quit feigning to be an intellectual - cutNpaste is NOT a new skill.
  • 8/10/2008 8:56 AM Jack Thompson, Attorney wrote:
    MESSAGE TO THE FLORIDA BAR: GOTCHA!


    "PAID FOR BY THE FLORIDA BAR FOUNDATION"!

    http://www.cfglla.org/



    Florida:
    Central Florida Gay & Lesbian Law Association
    Contact: Kenneth Bryk
  • 8/10/2008 10:27 AM JackDon'tKnowJack wrote:
    Jack Thompson = Fred Phelps
    Fred Phelps = Jack Thompson
  • 8/10/2008 11:04 AM HarmlessBunny wrote:
    @Jack Thompson:

    Uh huh, you really have them *shakes his head* Ummmm when is it illegal to affiliate with a gay & lesbian group? From what I understand that isn't illegal. Bad enough you tried to go after Janet Reno, Norm Kent, now Bryk is your target? Jack, are you now insinuating that homosexuals are behind your bar troubles?

    @JDKJ: Yeeeeeah no kidding. Jack would fit in just fine with those mental ill zealots. However Jack at this point is grasping straws and being HILARIOUS while doing it
  • 8/10/2008 11:18 AM JackDon'tKnowJack wrote:
    @HarmlessBunny:

    And it's not just any ol' gay and lesbian group which the Florida Bar apparently supports. It's an organization of legal practitioners centered on the law and legal issues. God forbid and strike them all with plagues that the Florida Bar, itself an organization of legal practitioners centered on the law and legal issues, should support them.
  • 8/10/2008 2:40 PM Anonymous wrote:
    U know why I think your Gay??? You are uber anti-gay...make and wear macrame shorts..have an Asia poster above your bed...give the gay-face in photos...Pitch or catch Jack...I guess catch. Gotcha!
  • 8/13/2008 7:30 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Who gives a rip about Hillary? She's out. It's Obama's turn at the helm. He couldn't possibly do any worse than what we've had?
  • 8/13/2008 8:09 PM Anonymous wrote:
    yes, much worse

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Comments are closed.