4 on 17

Lazarus    affirm 4D05-4847-Warthen v. State*
Rothschild  affirm 4D07-1793.
Grossman   reverse 4D07-2273-Provenzano v. Provenzano
Gates    reverse-remand  4D08-1258-Andrew v. State
M.Kaplan   petition granted  4D08-3114-Dixon v. State*
Holmes & Gardiner   reverse-remand  4D08-531-Mancino v. State
 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 8/10/2008 8:47 AM Jack Thompson Attorney wrote:
    John B. Thompson, Attorney at Law
    5721 Riviera Drive
    Coral Gables, Florida 33146
    305-666-4366

    August 10, 2008

    Barry Richard
    Greenberg Traurig
    101 East College Avenue
    Tallahassee, Florida Via Fax and e-mail

    Re: Bar v. Thompson v. Bar

    Dear Mr. Richard:

    Unless I hear from somebody at or with The Bar (that would include you, Barry) by noon Monday, August 11, that we are going to sit down to try to resolve the above, then I am going to amend a pending state action and name both The Bar and its prosecutor Barnaby Min in a libel action. I will reach the jury on at least that count.

    As you know, Mr. Min went on a very public legal community blog, http://justicebuilding.blogspot.com/, and during my bar “trial” posted false and defamatory comments about me. The reaction at the site to Mr. Min’s libel was that I must be mentally ill. The desired impact of Mr. Min was thus achieved.

    Further, you need to know that I just found out from an insider at The Bar that Mr. Bryk, one of my two Bar prosecutors, is apparently quite an activist on a particular issue that dovetailed nicely into Mr. Chaykin’s activism on the same issue, and it coalesced into a “get Jack Thompson at any cost” cabal.

    This explains a great deal of the prosecutorial misconduct that Mr. Bryk visited upon me. The calculated decision by The Bar to put this rabid radical on my case is beyond dumb. It is criminally dumb.

    Mr. Bryk took the lead at my trial, now not surprisingly, in misrepresenting case law and facts to Referee Tunis. You may think you can get away with this, but not in a libel action against The Bar and Mr. Min, wedded to other now pending causes of action. One of the happy consequences is that a subpoena will now reveal who “Rumpole” is.

    Please advise within the above time table. Thanks so much. And thanks to The Bar insider who told me what I need to know and who is talking even more. Who said that dead men tell no tales?

    Regards, Jack Thompson
  • 8/10/2008 10:59 AM Micheal Ramier wrote:
    I hear a fly buzzing. It is not going away.
  • 8/10/2008 3:38 PM Tarosan wrote:
    No one cares -_-
  • 8/11/2008 11:29 AM NEEDS HELP wrote:
    Jack, it's time to change your message! The old one is getting stale.
  • 8/13/2008 9:53 AM Say no to Sprinkles...Vote Shak not Lemack wrote:
    Looks like things are slow for the mediator clown disgraced judge sprinkles/spechler since he has so much free time to walk around with Rick Lemack for Sheriff. If you dont believe me call him yourself, his number is on the Lemack website for where to walk for Lemack. Call the number and ask for Sprinkles.

    http://ricklemack.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/rick-lemack-schedule-updated-daily/

    Down with Sprinkles/Ross/Lynch crew....
    VOTE SHAK NOT LEMACK
  • 8/13/2008 1:03 PM so if... wrote:
    when sprinkles is campaigning in the black neighborhoods is he chocolate sprikles? in the gay neighborhoods he is rainbow sprinkles?
  • 8/13/2008 1:28 PM hi adj wrote:
    gotta admit the last post you did was a little funny...
    pushing shak is interesting but its obvious if shak wins it would make life easier for your buddy lamberti. you are transparent as usual
  • 8/13/2008 4:01 PM erhard milch wrote:
    everyone knows in advance when ex-judge jay spechler is within ten miles of the broward courthouse....... his body odor precedes him and seltzer comes out to share a squirt.
  • 8/13/2008 7:13 PM drooling down wrote:
    Now he's just getting some wear out of his Lamack tee shirt and trying to stare everyone down. Same old Sprinks. Why can't he get it? That old stare of his just doesn't work anymore. It may still work on A-Turd, but everyone knows A-Turd's a sucker for attention.

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Comments are closed.