SO LONG JACKIE BOY

                                  JACK THOMPSON PERMANENTLY DISBARRED

       (Thanks to "DISBARRED: Jack Thompson" under "JAABLOG WELCOME" 9/25 at 11:13 am) 

                                                

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 5
  • 9/25/2008 11:40 AM Nelson wrote:
    Ha Ha!
  • 9/25/2008 11:41 AM Wow wrote:
    Sucks to be him. That is a harsh opinion.
    But my money is on a future story of JT being charged with unauthorized practice of law very soon. Who is with me on that bet?
  • 9/25/2008 11:43 AM Tarosan wrote:
    Best news all day, the moron's gone!
  • 9/25/2008 11:45 AM G-D Help Us wrote:
    Now that he is not an attorney he has complete free speech rights! Run for the hills - the real unabridged Jack Thompson has been let loose!
  • 9/25/2008 11:51 AM Anonymous wrote:
    11:41, Sucker bet. Just a question of when.
  • 9/25/2008 12:01 PM attackgypsy wrote:
    Ding dong the witch is dead.

    Of course, he'll appeal. But we all know that less than 1% of all appeals are successful.

    Game over, Jacky boy.
  • 9/25/2008 12:13 PM Mnementh2230 wrote:
    WOOHOO!

    There's a song I wrote today in honor of this...

    Sung to the tune of "It had to be you"

    It sucks to be youuuuu...
    it sucks to be Youuuuuu!
    It's good to be me, it's great to be us, but it sucks to be youuuuuuu!
  • 9/25/2008 12:23 PM BearDogg-X wrote:
    Na Na Na Na
    Na Na Na Na
    Oh Hell Yeah
    Goodbye

    The Stone Cold Steve Austin version of that song.

    Jack Thompson, you lost your license because you flat out refused to practice what you preached about growing up and getting a life.
  • 9/25/2008 12:25 PM Mnementh2230 wrote:
    Just finished reading the document - his disbarrment doesn't start for another 30 days, unless he tells the bar he has no current clients. I'm willing to bet that, even though he probably has no current clients, he'll let the thirty days go as long as possible... because he's a coward at heart (as evidenced by his bullying and unethical tactics).
  • 9/25/2008 12:26 PM career oppty wrote:
    maybe he can gopher at his wife's law firm...go for lunch....go for dry cleaning etc
  • 9/25/2008 12:26 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Jack, where you gonna get the 40k from? I'd pay to be at your dinner table at home tonight.
  • 9/25/2008 12:31 PM Mnementh2230 wrote:
    40k? What's that from?
  • 9/25/2008 12:31 PM Phantom Fauxtoshopper on JT wrote:
    Ahh Jack.....We hardly knew you.....

    http://i477.photobucket.com/albums/rr135/PhantomFauxtoshopper/HittheRoadJack3-1.jpg

    Parting is such sweet sorrow, but don't let the door hit you on the A$$ as you're leaving.

    You don't have to go home but you can't stay here.

    The Phantom
  • 9/25/2008 12:33 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Thats how much he has to pay in legal fees
  • 9/25/2008 12:36 PM Tarosan wrote:
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    He won't get the 40k... sadly he'll end up in prison.
  • 9/25/2008 12:39 PM Dog Welder wrote:
    The beautiful (and sad) thing about this is that Jack was undone from the outset by his own narcissistic ego.

    Good riddance, jerkface.
  • 9/25/2008 12:41 PM Shoehorn O'Plenty wrote:
    No, the beautiful thing is that the sanction imposed on him still stands, and you know full well that he will not have any opposition to this ruling signed by another attorney due to his righteous narcissism. End of the road Jack.
  • 9/25/2008 12:47 PM Jack Thompson, Attorney wrote:
    PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY FLORIDA SUPREME COURT’S PERMANENT DISBARMENT ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2008
    COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, on his own behalf, and moves this federal court, pursuant to the applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for the following emergency relief on the following grounds, stating:
    1. All seventy-seven defendants have been served with the complaint herein; thus, they are all fully on notice as to the nature of this suit, the relief sought, and the basis therefor.
    2. Today, at approximately 11 am, on September 25, 2008, the Florida Supreme Court, has entered an order, a copy of which is attached hereto, permanently disbarring plaintiff Thompson, the respondent therein, effective in thirty days. Thus, the clock is now running on those thirty days. This is an emergency.
    3. Under this order, Thompson is unable, for example, to meet, as he is scheduled to do next Friday, with Richard Gorman, who is an inmate in a state prison for the purpose of being retained by him as his lawyer. Mr. Gorman is sitting in his prison cell solely because of the unethical conduct of Assistant State Attorney Matthew Alex Smith and the obstruction of justice by the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar. The attached Report of No Probable Cause is a smoking gun document that proves that the entire Board of Governors of The Florida Bar is involved in a cover-up in order to keep this innocent man in jail, all for the purpose of protecting the corrupt Leon County State Attorney’s Office. It is the single most remarkable document Thompson has ever seen in his 31-year legal career. It indicts the entire Bar’s disciplinary process which in that instance is being perverted to keep an innocent man in jail. It is little wonder that these same Governors would then do to Thompson what they have demonstrably done over the past four years.
    4. Thompson was to meet with Mr. Gorman for the purpose of securing his release from jail, and now Thompson cannot be retained by Mr. Gorman for that or for any other purpose. Thus, one of the consequences of this disbarment order is not only Thompson’s inconvenience, to say the least, but more importantly the thwarting of the retention of Thompson by an innocent man in jail who is the victim of the obstruction of justice of The Florida Bar and its Governors.
    5. Plaintiff herein thus seeks an immediate stay, on an emergency basis, of the Florida Supreme Court’s disbarment order because he can show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm unless the injunction issues, including public damage to his career and to the rights of others, such as those of Mr. Gorman, that this harm far outweighs any conceivable harm to defendants if the injunction issues, and that the injunction will not disserve but actually serve the public interest.
    6. Further, there are demonstrable factual errors in the disbarment order itself, which provide the basis for the disbarment, which ca
  • 9/25/2008 12:47 PM palin putin wrote:
    who is michael hamaway ........... what is a ''judge pump ''.
  • 9/25/2008 12:52 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Maybe Jack can get work as Pedro's paralegal.
  • 9/25/2008 12:52 PM Jack Thompson, Attorney wrote:
    ACTUALLY, KIDDIES, THIS IS WHEN THE REAL FUN BEGINS. CONTINUING WITH THE EMERGENCY FILING OF TODAY WITH JUDGE COOKE:

    which provide the basis for the disbarment, which can be easily and quickly proven. Additionally, it is fascinating that Justice Canady, who has undoubtedly reviewed absolutely nothing about this disciplinary case, has put his name to this disbarment order on the day that he was served with the federal civil rights action. What a coincidence.
    WHEREFORE, plaintiff respectfully seeks an order, on an emergency basis, staying the Florida Supreme Court’s disbarment order until such time as an evidentiary hearing, either before Judge Cooke or Magistrate Bandstra, can be secured as to the granting of a preliminary injunction sought in the complaint.
    I HEREBY CERTIFY that this pleading has been provided to all defendants and/or their counsel by various means, including fax and e-mail, this September 25, 2008.
  • 9/25/2008 12:53 PM DavCube wrote:
    Was this signed by someone other than yourself, Mr. Thompson? No?

    Then congratulations: YOU LOSE.
  • 9/25/2008 12:54 PM Jack Thompson, Attorney wrote:
    PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY FLORIDA SUPREME COURT’S PERMANENT DISBARMENT ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2008
    COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, on his own behalf, and moves this federal court, pursuant to the applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for the following emergency relief on the following grounds, stating:
    1. All seventy-seven defendants have been served with the complaint herein; thus, they are all fully on notice as to the nature of this suit, the relief sought, and the basis therefor.
    2. Today, at approximately 11 am, on September 25, 2008, the Florida Supreme Court, has entered an order, a copy of which is attached hereto, permanently disbarring plaintiff Thompson, the respondent therein, effective in thirty days. Thus, the clock is now running on those thirty days. This is an emergency.
    3. Under this order, Thompson is unable, for example, to meet, as he is scheduled to do next Friday, with Richard Gorman, who is an inmate in a state prison for the purpose of being retained by him as his lawyer. Mr. Gorman is sitting in his prison cell solely because of the unethical conduct of Assistant State Attorney Matthew Alex Smith and the obstruction of justice by the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar. The attached Report of No Probable Cause is a smoking gun document that proves that the entire Board of Governors of The Florida Bar is involved in a cover-up in order to keep this innocent man in jail, all for the purpose of protecting the corrupt Leon County State Attorney’s Office. It is the single most remarkable document Thompson has ever seen in his 31-year legal career. It indicts the entire Bar’s disciplinary process which in that instance is being perverted to keep an innocent man in jail. It is little wonder that these same Governors would then do to Thompson what they have demonstrably done over the past four years.
    4. Thompson was to meet with Mr. Gorman for the purpose of securing his release from jail, and now Thompson cannot be retained by Mr. Gorman for that or for any other purpose. Thus, one of the consequences of this disbarment order is not only Thompson’s inconvenience, to say the least, but more importantly the thwarting of the retention of Thompson by an innocent man in jail who is the victim of the obstruction of justice of The Florida Bar and its Governors.
    5. Plaintiff herein thus seeks an immediate stay, on an emergency basis, of the Florida Supreme Court’s disbarment order because he can show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm unless the injunction issues, including public damage to his career and to the rights of others, such as those of Mr. Gorman, that this harm far outweighs any conceivable harm to defendants if the injunction issues, and that the injunction will not disserve but actually serve the public interest.
    6. Further, there are demonstrable factual errors in the disbarment order itself, which provide the basis for the disbarment,
  • 9/25/2008 12:56 PM DavCube wrote:
    You say he didn't review it? The suggestion was given to him back in July, Mr. Thompson. It's now September. That gave him 2 months. Can you say '2 months?' Very GOOD, boys and girls.
  • 9/25/2008 12:59 PM Zerodash wrote:
    You go, Jack. You have them right where you want them. Watching you fail yet again (for the last time) will be, as always, highly entertaining.
  • 9/25/2008 1:02 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Jack filed this in a federal court, not the Fla. Supreme Court. He can still do that without another attorney.
  • 9/25/2008 1:03 PM S. Conway wrote:
    Keep fighting the fight Jack. Us free speech guys have to stick together
  • 9/25/2008 1:06 PM Dog Welder wrote:
    Jack,

    Your entire argument is essentially, "Disbarring me irreparably harms my career?" I think that was the point of it, wasn't it?

    And here's an idea for Mr. Gorman: perhaps he can hire any of the number of KNOWLEDGEABLE and DECENT attorneys who still have licenses to practice.
  • 9/25/2008 1:08 PM Shoehorn O'Plenty wrote:
    Organise a new lawyer for him, fill that lawyer in on all the relevent information he needs to defend this Mr. Gorman. Not that hard i would imagine? Can't your wife do it?

    On another note, do you relly think that Mr. Gorman will be pleased about hiring a lawyer who has been disbarred? I think it's quite likely you will get a polite message from Mr. Gorman telling you; "Dear Mr. Thompson, I have retained another person as my attorney so as not to take any of your time away from the difficult position you are in. Yours, Richard Gorman"

    For the record, there are no demonstrable errors in the order. Unless you can point them out to us?
  • 9/25/2008 1:12 PM BearDogg-X wrote:
    Jack, did you even read today's opinion?

    They read the report. They agreed with the findings. You lose your license on October 25th.

    As far as Richard Gorman(never heard of him anyway) goes, he'll have to get a new attorney to help him get out of jail(or he'll be provided one for him, per Miranda rights).

    Practice what you preach: Grow up and get a life. You lost, deal with it, son.
  • 9/25/2008 1:12 PM Incompetent Boob wrote:
    He should be disbarred for basic incompetence as a lawyer. This moron sued everybody in the State of Florida and never won a dime. What a freakin' loser.
  • 9/25/2008 1:13 PM Tarosan wrote:
    I don't think anyone wants to touch you now Jackie Boy... 30 days and then you'll be working in a Mcdonalds.
  • 9/25/2008 1:13 PM Shoehorn O'Plenty wrote:
    Oh, lest i forget, you did have another attorney in good standing with the Florida Bar sign off on this filing? If you had read the Disbarrment order you would know that the sanction placed on you is still in effect. It doesn't limit you from defending yourself, but is in place to ensure you do so properly.

    I assume however, that you are well aware of the sanction and are just ignoring it, like you have done for the past several months and as a result are going nowhere fast.
  • 9/25/2008 1:17 PM Dog Welder wrote:
    Would the Richard Gorman you plan on defending be the Richard Gorman of Oevau Technologies or Cenefil? This guy shows up all over the internet like a bad penny:

    http://www.ripoffreport.com/searchResults.asp?q1=ALL&q2=&q3=&q4=&q5=oevau%20technologies&q6=&q7=&searchtype=0&submit2=Search!&r=1

    Looks like birds of a feather. Yeah, Jack, I'm sure he's being "railroaded" and is totally innocent. (The guys who do those "Smiling Bob" male enhancement commercials operate in my city. They just got locked up and fined for running a very similar scam.)
  • 9/25/2008 1:18 PM HarmlessBunny wrote:
    Awwwww Jack, you need to change your user name. It is "Jack Thompson, Ex-Attorney"

    Yet I predicted this...you would panic and scream as they stripped you of your license. You would, like a rabid animal, bite all the hands around you, hoping in vain to get someone to pay attention to you. You have been tried, and judged. Good riddance you waste of human flesh.

    Pray that the non-stop harassment of good people that you have done, will not bite you in the rear pretty soon.
  • 9/25/2008 1:26 PM He Never Says Die wrote:
    Got to admire Jack. He never quits. He has been peeing in the wind for two years now and is absolutely drenched in his own urine and vomit yet he still keeps coming back for more. You go Jack. In a strange way you are a real American Hero.
  • 9/25/2008 1:28 PM The Right Stuff wrote:
    He can still be a judge in Florida I think.
  • 9/25/2008 1:43 PM ApokalypseNow wrote:
    Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out - I don't want ass-smudges on my new door!
  • 9/25/2008 2:06 PM Dog Welder wrote:
    Hey, Jack,

    If you have all this "smoking gun evidence" that proves you're innocent and that the Referee's Report is full of factual errors, should you have not brought this evidence up during your trial? Or maybe at the disciplinary hearing? (You know, the one you WALKED OUT ON? Great strategy there, Jack!) Or maybe you should have had another attorney sign your petitions to the SCOFLA with the "evidence?"

    The federal courts are not going to overturn this. You've presented them nothing new. (And those judges hate your guts, too.)
  • 9/25/2008 2:11 PM tony selby wrote:
    i suppose this somewhat puts the kibosh on Jacks run for president of the Bar then?

    not that he really had any intention of running
  • 9/25/2008 3:48 PM Nekojin wrote:
    Since when has Thompson EVER been a "free speech guy?" His entire CAREER has been focused on eliminating entertainment media that he personally objects to. If that's a, "free speechguy," I'll start referring to the KKK as, "black rights guys."
  • 9/25/2008 5:00 PM Sortableturnip wrote:
    Enjoy disbarment, Jack...

    Remember, in your next choice of career, to memorize the following:

    "Would you like to biggie size that?"

    HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
  • 12/1/2008 4:21 PM Jack Thompson, Once and Future Attorney (Trust Me) wrote:
    No, it's a different Richard Gorman, idiot.
  • 12/1/2008 5:51 PM Sortableturnip wrote:
    Ooooo.....Great comeback....only 2 1/2 weeks late....stupid...

Page: 1 of 5
Leave a comment

Comments are closed.