SO LONG JACKIE BOY
JACK THOMPSON PERMANENTLY DISBARRED
(Thanks to "DISBARRED: Jack Thompson" under "JAABLOG WELCOME" 9/25 at 11:13 am)
(Thanks to "DISBARRED: Jack Thompson" under "JAABLOG WELCOME" 9/25 at 11:13 am)
Jack is a great man and a warrior. He is fighting the Florida MAFIA - the Flaa. BAR and BOGovners. This is the same MOB that IGNORED their own findings that Matt SMITH was a proven ROGUE prosecutor, and decided to leave my son in prison for a 4th year. YES -Rich Gorman is INNOCENT= MY son is INNOCENT; he was NIFONGED thru corruption in Leon County SAO; When I CAUGHT him red handed via BAR complaint, it was swept out the back door by the corrupt silk suits. LIKE to GAMBLE folks - BET on Thompson &Gorman. We were educated in TOP schools in Penna. and OHIO -- versus 60 Fla knucklehead lawyers. A Fla. law degree is equal to 5th grade up North. Both Jack and My son Rich are victims of corruption and a MOB. NONE of them understand LAW 19. Jack is not going away. AND neither am I. Rich Gorman Sr.
SSSSMMMMIIIIIIITTTTHHHH!!!!!! have a good day.
Rich Gorman was NIFINGED in Leon County
Yeah... that cleared things up.
Uh huh.
....
NOT!
Of course, despite the ramblings, the reference to Nifong suggest that this IS the same Gorman accused of rape. And probably the same Gorman who wants his arse protected by having the sex offender registry changed.
Andrew
Well, I certainly wouldn't gamble on Thompson winning any court cases any time soon. He hasn't won any in the past 20 or so years, so why would he start now?
@ Big G
Thompson a "great man" and a "warrior"?
Would a "great man" take pleasure in the death of a guy drowned saving the life of his wife?
Would a "great man" take pleasure in and make fun of a person's suicide?
Funny, we call people like that "jerks" or far worse.
Would a "warrior" hide behind his cancer-stricken wife to avoid punishment for his crimes?
Would a "warrior" hide behind children to justify his anti-First Amendment(anti-American) agenda?
That's a "coward", not a "warrior".
If a "Florida law degree is equal to 5th Grade", then that must make Thompson's degree from Vanderbilt(which is in Nashville, Tennessee) equal to kindergarten in your view. Meaning he wouldn't understand "LAW 19" either, and neither would I, as I'm not a lawyer.
Victims of "corruption"? Yes, Jack victimized himself. Being found guilty of making false statements in court that he knew to be false tends to show said person as "corrupt".
If I were you, Mr. Gorman, Sr., I'd advise my son to find another attorney. But that's just my opinion.
Indeed. Jack Thompson is a serial liar - hundreds of examples are available online, and for a quick summary you can check his wikiquote page. It's full of Jack's hatred, lies, and bigotry.
If you want to HELP your case, get an attorney who has a specialty in his type of case, and forget JT.
@Big G:
Hate to break the bad new to you, but if an education at a top school in Ohio or Pennsylvania is the source of the agrument that Jack's disbarment should be stayed so that your son may retain Thompson's legal services, then you should seek a refund of your tuition. And alternatively attend a top school in Massachussets or Connecticut, next time.
@Big G:
Lemme ask you this:
If all the facts of your son's case remained unchanged but for the fact that he's the white, college-educated, child of middle-class parents, would anyone know or care who Rich Gorman, Jr. was? Let's make Rich a poor, black, high school drop-out but keep all other facts of the case the same. They'd bury that kid under the prison your son's now serving time in and no one, including you or Jack Thompson, would care.
Ya'll shoulda took the plea bargain deal when it was offered. Just like Jack should have took his plea bargain deal from the Bar when it was offered. But ya'll, just like JAck, stuck to your guns and ended up behind the 8 ball as a result.
As Jack would say, "Deal with it."
Hey Gents — I spoke to Jack T. about 2 months ago. I am Rich Gorman’s Dad. I suck at video games and gave up after Space Invaders. I am a retired executive. You are missing a HUGE Humanatarian constitutional connection. Jack has always claimed ” corrupt” and “foul” about the Fla. BAR. WELL — I can PROVE IT !! My son was railroaded in Tallahassse on a (BS BS BS) 10 second date rape! When the prosecutor knew he was losing - he conjured up a second charge for leverage. The scum bag ended up prosecuting Richie 2 times with NO Probable Cause. That means he had NO reason to continue. He did and he cheated and he lied, etc misconduct — he also committed a felony against richie !! I filed a BAR complaint against the prosecutor AND the Grievance Committee found him guilty of illegally prosecuting - after a 9 month investigation. The only NIFONG -like prosecutor found in Fla in 10 years. So, instead of my son getting help, the Board of Governors “dismissed” the charges against Matt Smith Prosecutor , and wrote me a letter — Smith is guilty, we agree with the investigators, too bad Mr. Gorman - we have to protect our own asses. (essenceof ltr). So like Jack or Hate Jack, Jack has found 100% proof that the Fla. BAR is a bunch of criminals. The Fla BAR a -holes just called my sons prison and said DO NOT let Jack see Richie on Friday !! Sounds like a scared bunch of pusses to me. My son was a video king before he was falsely prosecuted. I have no opinion about games. But I will deal very harshly with anybody that forks with my family. Florida is NAZI Germany re-lived. It is true. As for you smartasses living off 3 year old data, a panel of 9 Fla. Lawyers decided Matt Smith was a cheat after a long investigation. I have lived it! It has almost killed my wife!! I have driven over 75,000 miles to drive rich's 3 year old daughter Alexis to bond with him. They both brighten the lives of everyone in prison . How many of you GAMERS are in support of real life torture. I mean sending a person into a toxic laundry room for 7 months knowing it was making him sick; he shot a clot and lost part vision in his right eye. BUT nothing stops a good man like Richie--He finished his college degree and obtained paralegal cert. As for the A hole who commented about the sex offender laws - Richie has written his own writ of certorari to the US Supreme Court to have them declared Unconstitutional for OFFENDERS - NOT for Sex Predators. The legislators have screwed it all up. We will see what happens. If there is anyone out there that does not like Rich - shut the F -up . You could not handle 1 day of what he has endured for 3 years as an innocent person in corrupt Florida If I can get a 1 in 500,000 Bar Complaint approved by Fla Criminal lawyers, well I can certainly track down your faggot ass. Got it !! Let us PREY ! MR. Gorman aka Danger DAD
Take care of your kid - good luck. But forget Jack Thompson - he's part of the problem.
I'm confused by this line
"My son was railroaded in Tallahassse on a (BS BS BS) 10 second date rape"
Is it not rape if he only forced her to have intercourse for ten seconds? I wasn't aware that Florida had a ten second rule. Also, he should be congratulated on his cert petition. Never heard of a pro se prisoner doing that before
@MR. Gorman aka Danger DAD:
Do yourself and Rich a favor. Forget Jack Thompson. He's only latching on to your son's situation to leech what he can in order to further his own interests. Besides, he's crazier than a bed-bug and more ornery than a rabid dog.
And, whatever you do, don't say ain't nobody try to warn you.
I've already pointed out the dishonorable, unethical, acts of John Bruce. There are plenty more. Video games are irrelevant to this case. And you've proven it further.
Like John Bruce, you tell your opposition to shut up. Like John Bruce, another Anti-First Amendment piece of guttertrash.
I've seen the evidence. I've seen the other articles on the case. Even the jury was hung on the outcome. But your son RAPED an intoxicated girl. She never had the right to consent in the first place. And from what I've also read, it sounds like Rich and his family also tried to have the victim judged as well.
You can scream railroad. All I see is a PREDATOR who committed TWO rapes.
YOUR violent outbursts and terroristic threats show just where the REAL problem is. One sociopath (Sr.) raising another sociopath (Jr.).
It isn't a surprise that you want to associate with John Bruce. In your own post, you admit to being a bigot like him. You've automatically assumed a sexuality in my comments and given it a negative reference.
So, let's see. Daddy is a bigot. Daddy is Anti-US Constitution. Daddy makes terrorist threats against his opposition, even when the opposition has only made verbal (through writing) comments. Daddy wants to cover up his child's sociopathic rapist son.
Gee, I wonder what REALLY turned Jr. to be a violent rapist? Musta been GTA. :/
No, it isn't a surprise that you would ask such an individual as John Bruce to be your son's attorney.
John Bruce is a bigot. He's admitted so numerous times with his homophobic rants.
John Bruce is an Anti-US Contitionalist. If he don't like it, then it isn't protected speech. If he don't approve of what someone says, it ain't protected speech. If it's in opposition to him, it ain't protected speech. And HE is the one who should decide what is or is not appropriate for OTHER PEOPLE AND THEIR CHILDREN.
John Bruce has used religious scripture to threaten the lives of others. John Bruce has even directly implied that anyone who speaks opposition to him should be legally executed.
John Bruce wanted the abuse (including near sexual abuse) of Cody Posey covered up and ignored in favor of his own agenda.
Nope, not a surprise in the least that you chose John Bruce.
And your rant only furthers my belief that your sociopathic rapist son did, indeed, set out to rape his victim and that it's most likely he had committed rape a second time.
Find me. Kill me. Kill my child. I have no doubt that you could and would. Clearly, you are a sociopath, like your own son.
But realize this: If I were truly impressed with your threats, I'd could easily publically ruin you and use your own words to further the guilty appearance of your son. Congratulations! You only have yourself to blame for that! But, like John Bruce, you won't take responsibility for your own actions.
As with John Bruce, I'm unimpressed with you.
Andrew
Like others here, I gotta say that "10 seconds" of rape actually IS rape. You came in here and ADMITTED your son is a rapist, yet he was "railroaded" by a corrupt legal community? It sounds like he's sitting right where he needs to be. It sounds like he deserves to be on a list of sexual PREDATORS. And it sounds like John Bruce Thompson is the perfect lawyer for you. After all, Jack will spin all sorts of lies to further his agenda (the Florida Bar is corrupt) while ignoring all of the facts and evidence of the case (your son is a rapist).
Let me guess: your son told you that he didn't do it. It must be true because everyone in jail is innocent.
Here is a good conversation, including a comment allegedly by the foreperson at the trial:
http://www.reddit.com/comments/5crv/five_years_in_prison_for_515_seconds
Andrew
After reading the entirety of what you actually wrote, you're disgusting. Nevermind.
You belong in prison right next to your son.
A few more stories on Gorman:
http://www.local6.com/news/4442195/detail.html
http://www.feministing.com/archives/005002.html
(Scroll down a bit to get to the Gorman story and comments.)
The Kathleen Parker story constantly referred to:
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/kathleen/parker050306.php3
Her followup story:
http://townhall.com/columnists/KathleenParker/2006/05/10/when_date_rape_is_a_life_sentence
Can't find an active link to the Willie Meggs article. I'm not sure right off hand if that was the opposing piece I saw last night when online or not. I know that there was a counterpoint to Parker's piece. And they seemed like the extremes at both ends of the argument. But I can't find that link now. Maybe when I get home, I can check my IE history and find it that way.
I did notice, however, that this so-called 30 pound box of "evidence" seems to originate from Gorman's family. fancy that? And considering the attitude of the person calling themselves Gorman Sr, I have to wonder how much is actually REAL evidence and how much is merely blaming the victim.
Andrew
And this is why I really, really hope to NEVER have to sit in jury for a rape trial.
It's a crime with a lot of emotions behind it and very little hard evidence. Esp in date rape trials you usually have the words of two people and social assumptions concerning how 'men' and 'women' think and act.
There are no good solutions here either. On the one hand we don't want to punish the victim more, on the other hand, there are people who use that 'be nice to the poor girl' mentality to do some pretty horrible things in trials like this.. so in some ways the accuser is really not vetted nearly well enough and doesn't have NEARLY enough consequences for false statements.
Either way, they should get a real lawyer, not JT.
Here's the text of the Meggs response:
"Columnist told one side of rape case
One of the most important functions of the Office of the State Attorney is to stand up for the victims of crime. It is in that vein that I must respond to a recent commentary by Kathleen Parker regarding the rape conviction of Rich Gorman (“Brief encounter ruined a young man's life,” May 4).
Parker is the latest victim of Gorman's public-relations campaign, which employs the age-old defense tactic of blaming the victim. She talks about a 30-pound box of court documents that she apparently failed to review, and not once has she called this office for information. Had Parker done so, she would have found that the “regular college Joe” she describes actually ran an escort service and had a thriving computer business.
Had Parker done her homework, she would have found that Gorman invited the underage victim to go out in a limousine with four other girls and provided plenty of booze. He also stopped to pick up a stripper and proceeded to a local bar. It was there that the victim became ill and asked to be taken home. Gorman volunteered to take her home but bypassed her dorm and took her to his house. Charged with rape - his second charge in a matter of months - Gorman's “first” story was that nothing happened. When positive DNA results were returned, his firm denials changed to “it was consensual.”
Gorman has been successful in convincing a jury of one - Kathleen Parker - of his innocence. He was less successful with a six-person jury, which delivered a unanimous guilty verdict. Thankfully, the jurors considered all the evidence, not just one side.
WILLIAM N. MEGGS
State Attorney"
Yeah, sounds like Gorman is an innocent little snowflake.
Jack does attract the darndest sorts, don't he? Speaking of, where's my boy, David Lindsey, been at lately? He went from 160 to 0 in 2 seconds.
Thanks Dog Welder. It is a good response article. It's not the one I had read last night in counter to Parker's article, but it's a great one anyway. I'm not sure if the TownHall article being referenced by Reddit was Willie's or the article I read as the TownHall article has gone kerpoof!
On another note, I'm sure you've seen John Bruce's latest rant:
http://judicialhorrorstories.blogspot.com/2008/09/florida_30.html
I still want my "What, me Worry?" T-shirt with the Alfred E. Newman picture wearing a John Bruce hairdo and little cameras and mics pointing at him all around him with little Men In Black running around watching him.
Andrew
Response to Pipitone / Smith / and other Morons from Mr. Gorman. I can read you!!! You knuckleheads are re-cycling data from 2 years ago. Since then, Based on a BAR Complaint of hundreds of pages of findings, followed by hundreds of pages of answers by Prosecutor Matt Smith, tons of prosecutorial misconduct came out -- how about jury tampering, how about violating a judges order during trial, how about prosecuting cases WITHOUT probable cause, etc etc This is 2008 data found by Florida BAR members, an independent panel. Smith is NIFONG x100. But some small minds can't get off of 2 year old data they were fed BY the Leon SAO - Smith. Channel 6 Tony Pipitone was duped by SMITH as the biggest stooge of all -- suckered into doing a no facts segment on TV about Rich -JUST before trial. We will never know if that "c" minus reporter influenced the jury with his incorrect, assinine story. And lose the topic of "sex with some drunk girl" She actually testified and KNEW NOTHING; did NOT want to press any charges. Rich had a live in girlfriend during the time.Pretty sure she would have noticed some other person in bed! So what did scumbag Matt Smith do directly after that females testimony - he filed charges with zero probable cause. Urban legend passes for evidence in NAZI-hassee.Every item I saw referenced above is yesterdays news. Todays news is this --
The Thompson world and the Gorman world merged together by fate -- Jacks 10 year claim about corruption in the BAR is 100% proven by the Rich Gorman case. And Rich is proven innocent --- the 10 second deal was a "consent" question; It was OK for the girl to lie over 30 times; and Smiths whispering mischief at trial mislead the jury.
Hey - I heard no comments about Torture so you ALL approve?? Seemed like a big deal at Abu Ghraib to have a dog bark at a man )WOW how awful) Does NOT compare to a 7 month intentional stint in a huge laundry room with tons of chemicals that one is allergic to. So is 7 months of torture, until you shoot a clot and lose some vision Just A OK -- God Bles America !!
@Big G:
Is Jack gonna use a "playing video games made me do it" defense in Lil' G's case?
@Big G:
Or lemme guess: the presiding judge didn't have a valid loyalty oath and therefore the entire trial was a nullity? Right?
Just so I understand the facts, can I assume that on the night in question, Lil' G was minding his own business, playing video games in his dorm room and that other person caught on surveillance tape in a parking lot with the victim minutes before the alleged rape is his long-lost twin brother?
You should get along just fine with Mr. Thompson. Both ya'll done fell off your rockers.
Lemme get this straight: The boy has a live-in girlfriend. The boy goes out, finds a girl to make out with (let's go neutral for a few seconds. He DOESN'T deny that his intent was to have sex, he claims he DID stop, so SOMETHING sexual was attempted).
And so, his attempt to, at least, sexually two-time his live in girlfriend (LIVE IN mind you, not just someone he goes to visit and go out on a date with from time to time) improves the view of his character... How?
Torture? I call BULLPUCKY! Prison. Jail. Even if the conditions in the laundry were bad, WORKING in the laundry is NOT torture.
Torture is waterboarding.
Torture is whipping.
Torture is taking a knife and cutting vital body parts slowly. (Too many prisoner of war movies, Damn you Chuck Norris!)
Neglect is using lead based paint in a room a child lives in.
Neglect is giving someone you don't know has diabetes high sugary foods.
Neglect is not keeping up maintenance on equipment used by a variety of other folks.
Civil suit for neglect? Yes.
Torture? Not on your life. You'd have to prove intent to do harm. Good luck with that.
Prison/Jail is NOT meant as a vaction. And many of us have, many times, screamed about the sweet treatment that many prisoners get.
Be thankful -I'M- not the one deciding how prisoners are treated. Violent offenders especially.
Solitary confinement.
Basic nutritional necessities only.
No newspapers, TV, video games, computers, books, NOTHING.
No visitors beyond legal counsel.
I'm sure I can think of some other things given the opportunity.
Yes, I've argued against injustice MANY times in the past. But I've always argued on BOTH sides of the coin.
And, again you're acting just like John Bruce. Now it's conspiracy theories.
Maybe Smith did act badly. That DOESN'T mean RG Jr. was innocent. That just means you're looking to get your rapist son off on a technicality.
And I've arguement against MANY a technicality situation in the past as well.
Andrew
@Big G -- so why didn't your brilliant lawyers put the live-in girlfriend on the stand and offer up an alibi? Oh, wait...chances are she wasn't home when your precious snowflake was bringing an underage drunk girl home with him. You keep conveniently forgetting things like video footage.
If Jack Thompson wasn't disbarred he'd be the perfect lawyer for you. Like you, he offers up nothing but wild conspiracy theories about how everyone is out to get him.
I know it must be hard to admit your child is a scumbag, but here's a newsflash: your child is a scumbag.
It is that same group of people (jackdon'tknowjack, beardog,etc, dogwelder, etc) that likes to comment on anything about Thompson. Now, you folks have taken it to the next level by lashing out at people who wanted to hire Jack (almost completely disbarred). After all of the complaining you folks have done about Thompson, I find you folks to be much less than angels as well. Jack is almost gone, so get your jabs in now, because what will you do without him? Apparently he justified (in your minds) your comments and attacks upon others. After he is gone, then see yourselves for what you have become. Look at what Jack made you.
@9:40 AM Anonymous:
"Look hooat choo make me do." -- Tony "Scarface" Montana
"Just when I thought I was out, they pulled me back in." Godfather III
9:40 Anon:
And yet, no where did you counter our arguments. No where in your rambling did you claim that what evidence we presented were untrue.
You just blathered on.
Nor do you seem to have a problem with the threats, let alone the comments, of Daddy G.
Your smoke screens are nothing more than foggy stink bombs.
And, yes, many intelligent folks know that John Bruce's disbarrment will not prevent him from continuing to lie to, deceive, misinform, and commit a great many other immoral, if not criminal, acts, all in the name of the Demon-Pretender-To-The-Throne-Of-Heaven which he claims to be his "God".
In the words of some of our younger generations:
You, sir, fail the internet!
Andrew