SO LONG JACKIE BOY
JACK THOMPSON PERMANENTLY DISBARRED
(Thanks to "DISBARRED: Jack Thompson" under "JAABLOG WELCOME" 9/25 at 11:13 am)
(Thanks to "DISBARRED: Jack Thompson" under "JAABLOG WELCOME" 9/25 at 11:13 am)
"You goddamn guineas, you really make me laugh. I do you a favor and take Freddie in when you're having a bad time, and now you're gonna try and push me out!" -- Moe Green, The Godfather
"He's still alive. They hit him with five shots and he's still alive!" -- Virgil "The Turk" Sollozzo, The Godfather
@9:40 Anonymous -- maybe you should go back and take a look through Daddy G's comments again. Calling people "faggots" and threatening to hunt down anyone who says anything bad about his precious snowflake. How does that sit with you?
Additionally, even though Thompson is disbarred, he's not going to go away. At least not quietly, anyway. He's going to continue to spew his lies to anyone who will give him the time of day. Of course, the people willing to give him the time of day are greatly reduced in number now, but the fact remains that he is STILL going to try to make life miserable for his "enemies."
And can anyone answer this question: why would anyone be adamant about wanting to hire a lawyer who has just been disbarred for being a liar? It makes no sense to me.
Doug, my comment was directed at the fact that it is the same cast of characters that constantly comments on Jack Thompson material. You five or six individuals appear to have at least one ax to grind. This Daddy G character is just one of the lastest JT topics. Now Daddy G has defended JT and his own son and has also given a pluthera of insults upon the regular cast of charaters. You might as well treat him just like JT (that is your logic --you know it --you and the cast are transparent). Put down the ax.
What my "ax" grind are the actions and comments of individuals. John Bruce has a very long history of attitudes, comments, abuses, lies, deceit, misinformation, and immoral acts. There is a great deal of research that can be done on the issues surrounding John Bruce. Wikipedia and Google are just two sources.
As to Daddy G, well, as they say "If you can't take it, don't dish it". Defense of his son IS NOT the only thing he dished. So he got back what he gave.
Oddly enough, if you were Daddy G, then the attitude of not liking being treated the same as he treats others is ALSO a John Bruce trait. But I doubt you are. No evidence to support it. Nevertheless, my quote above stands. If he's going to enter into a discussion in the manner he did, then he better not have thin skin to get back the same attitudes.
Andrew
@9:40 A:
And a poster to JAABlog with an axe to grind would differ from all the other JAABLog posters in what way, pray tell? Isn't JAABlog essentially a grindstone, peopled by an entire community of axe grinders?
You may have visited the wrong blog. The blog dedicated to sanctimonious, self-righteous twits is a few doors further down the hall.
Jack is just the sort of lawyer a rapist like Gorman deserves. One with a zero success rate.
After seeing Gorman's dad post it's to undertand the kids lack of any form of moral compass. They say that the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, but sometimes it appears it doesn't fall at all.
I don't have any ax to grind against anyone who wants to hire JT as a lawyer, I just think they're delusional to hire a guy with a poor history who's built a "practice" on lies, deceit and bullying in the place of a legal practice. And someone coming in here and preaching what a great guy Thompson is clearly hasn't done a shred of research.
On top of that, if someone is coming in here and saying "so-and-so is innocent," you'll have to pardon me for not taking their word at face value. A little digging usually shows there are two sides to the story, and in the past I've learned that the side Thompson is on rarely has any sort of truth to it. A simple Google search on Gorman revealed a whole slew of accusations of misdeeds that included the two rape accusations and witness tampering as well as credit card fraud. Sorry, but something here stinks.
If Gorman Sr. is really serious about getting his "innocent" son cleared of charges, he should find another lawyer.
The part that has me rolling on the floor is that, undergirding all the Big Gorman/Lil' Gorman nonsense, is the even greater nonsense of Jack arguing in essence, "I shouldn't be disbarred because I have a client -- albeit conveniently manufactured and technically not yet my client -- who needs my legal services." As if each and every attorney about to be disbarred wouldn't potentially have a client in need of their services. If Thompson's argument was valid, then who would ever get disbarred?
LOL.
I don't even know why he's bothering with Baby G.
He shoulda claimed Debra Lafave was his client. Then he could defend a sexual predator AND push his agenda at the same time. After all, she was blaming sex in the media for her crimes.
I guess you push whichever agenda is most useful to you at any given time.
Andrew
You are ignorant! This discussion is fruitless with you, since I possess about 2,000 pages of Investigative Facts, and you are mixing up 2 completely different allegations/ cases. A person can have a live-in girlfriend in JANUARY 2003 )alibi) and be falsely arrested in Dec 2004 by a douchebag that NEVER spoke to any "supposed hear=say" witness. Then a person can have broken up with same girlfriend in April 2003, and gone out partying on June 20, 2003 with about 10 people. The alleged 10 second rape (there was consent and then it was withdrawn) -- "and he stopped immediately and asked what's wrong"? The lyin girls testimony. She really testified to a rape in Virginia 2 years prior (by a boy named Rich)- exact same circumstances - BUT MOMMY and DADDY did not believe her.
Torture - waterboarding ?? I'll take that anyday versus, bloody noses swollen eyes, non-stop sneezing, toxin poison - each body is unique as to severe allergies. The prison had received a legal letter explaining family history on bleaches and such chemicals and there adverse effects. It pinpointed that Rich.s Grandma (still alive at 92) had shot a blood clot at age 28 and went blind in her right eye. There was plent of warning (months) and statements of intent by the scumbags at Liberty CI. Matt SMith and other NAZI's have been pinpointed as "guilty" on this. The FDLE is all over their ass.
Why don't you try it tough guy!!
I will leave you ALL with some GOOD news. 1) The Prosecutorial MISCONDUcT that has bee proven and ADMITTED to by the Florida BAR, 100% PROVES Jack T.'s complaints about the corrupt nature of these people. 2) FEDERAL LAWSUITS --- say it slowly FEDERAL LAWSUITS, Jack will be removed from the Florida BAR on October 25th. He is still a lawyer, and is fully able to work in FEDERAL Courts 3) Look for the Florida BAR to be in Shambles within 6 months = they may end up reporting to the Dept. of Agriculture and the 52 silk suits on the BOG History!! 4) I have hired 14 lawyers in phases of this tragedy; they have all served a purpose == but only Jack has pointed out that the "sentence" must be thrown out, because it was based on FRAUD - The Bar has admitted misconduct (cheating if you will) by the prosecutor, and that equals FRAUD. 14 other lawyers did not tell me that - and he is correct. I know nothing about gaming -- What he and I have in common is a dislike of NAZI's aka the Florida BAR Board of Governors. You can not believe it til you live it. Always be aware of LAW 19. Big G.
@Big G, who wroye:
"FEDERAL LAWSUITS --- say it slowly FEDERAL LAWSUITS, Jack will be removed from the Florida BAR on October 25th. He is still a lawyer, and is fully able to work in FEDERAL Courts."
If you, as a layperson, must post to a legal blog which is chock-full of lawyers and be condescending while doing so, could you at least try to know what your talking about first?
Say it slowly: admission to practice before a State Bate is a prerequisite to admission to practice before the Federal Bar. Once Jack's effectively disbarred by the Sate of Florida, there too goes his admission to the Federal District Courts in Florida. The only thing he'll be fully able to work in a federal court is a job as a janitor.
Are there any other pearls of your legal genius you'd like to share with us?
Your possession of 2000 pages means... squat. If that evidence can't be obtained through a seperate source, then I could just as easily argue that if that "evidence" is used to get a rapist off, then the justice/legal system must also be corrupt. And my argument would be just as valid as yours. The fact is that this "evidence" you have is just as manipulated as anything that could have been brought against Baby G.
You were the one who implied that Baby G had a live-in girlfriend AT THE TIME of the rape. Either he did, or he didn't. Are you trying to manipulate the evidence to fit your needs? Sounds corrupt to me.
I have no doubt that you would interpret her prior rape to serve your purposes. Again, John Bruce is well known for interpreting, misinforming, and outright lying about various events to serve his purposes.
Again: Neglect, not torture. You can manipulate data however you want. It still comes down to a lack of intent. It is true that sexual predators receive harsher treatment, by other prisoners if not personnel. But "intent" is still very hard to prove.
Godwin's law over and over again.
As to the "tough guy" bit, you're the one making threats to seek me out and do bodily harm. John Bruce has made multiple threats to sue anybody and everybody who verbally oppose him. I've been waiting over 2 years. I'll probably be dead of old age before he does. Of course, his own terrorist threats are recorded and the next one gets reported for safety reasons.
Andrew
Well, at least you said "shambles" instead of a burned out building. You've got that in your favor. :/
14 lawyers don't bring it up and you think one sociopath with major legal troubles, a bigot, a known liar and deceiver, and a paranoid conspiracy theorist will actually do Baby G any REAL good?
Good luck with that.
Not sure what games have to do with your son's rape conviction, but, hey, John Bruce has already announced that he plans on creating a website so that he can teach people how to use video games as an excuse to get out of responsibility for their criminal acts.
Whatever trips yer trigger.
Andrew
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
Although, in John Bruce's case, for the past few years, it's been "NO work and no play". And that's been his fault and his fault alone.
Andrew
@ Nightwng2000, JackDon'tKnowJack, Dog Welder, Big G
Found a discussion thread on the Gorman case here:
http://www.reddit.com/comments/5crv/five_years_in_prison_for_515_seconds
Apparently, the jury foreperson posted that Rich Gorman never testified in his own defense and that the defense relied on "'hear-say' witnesses"(your words, Big G). So why didn't he testify on his own behalf if he felt the girl lied?
10 seconds to rape someone? Someone in that thread link said it best, to paraphrase: It takes 10 seconds or less to kill someone. The amount of time a crime takes is irrelevant, whether it's in Florida or any other state.
Though it is ironic that Mr. Gorman is relying on a soon-to-be-ex-attorney who was found guilty in his Bar trial of making false statements in court.
Well, not defending Baby G, but it's pretty well established procedure for the defense not to have the accused testify. Doesn't look good in the eyes of us looking from our standpoint, but it's a normal thing. Looks about the same as someone who doesn't take a lie detector test. Everyone knows the devices aren't totally accurate, but not taking one gives the impression of guilt.
Andrew
Oh, and another important thing that may not be clear:
Smith's guilt or innocence is irrelevant to Baby G's guilt or innocence. That may or may not be the case in the judicial system, but the average watcher will intelligently say otherwise.
A serial child rapist who is set free because some boob incompetant police officer didn't read the accused their Rights or because a warrant was improperly served still committed the act and is still guilty in the eyes of society, even if not guilty under the law. And, rest assured, the incompetant boob of a police orricer or other bad acts by other court officers will find themselves in hot water. But that doesn't mean that the acts by the serial child rapist vanishes from history.
Andrew
Just so the record's clear and as FYI, Lil' Gorman was offered a plea bargain that would have resulted in probation and not a single day of jail-time. He chose to decline the offer and roll the dice before a jury of his peers. As we all know, by now, the dice came up craps.
That he now allegedly must be exposed to toxic chemicals in Hardee Correctional Institute's laundry room is the fault of no one but Lil' G. He could have just have easily choosen to sit up in his luxury condo in Orlando and continue to run his credit card scams. I'm not sympathetic. You gamble, you lose, you suck it up; not bitch and moan that the game was rigged.
@Lil' G:
And all the brothers on Cell Block "A" are complaining that you're putting starch in the underwear, again.
Isn't it funny the level of hypocrisy that John Bruce displays?
Throwing a temper tantrum when he can't file his own documents, claiming it's a violation of his Right to be his own counsel.
Then, he throws a tantrum when Baby G can't hire him as Baby G's counsel.
BUT, he has no problem filing demands that his opposition, the Florida Bar and others, CAN'T hire who THEY want for THEIR attornies.
I see he hasn't posted THAT hypocrisy yet.
What a maroon (spelled correctly).
Andrew
Guys at my high school would get "Nifonged" my other inmates 6-10 times a week all the time, it was no big deal.
THE GAME IS ON !!
@Big G If you got that moron acting on your son's behalf then it's game over already and you got no continues or quarters.
:: Sigh ::
Except in sarcasm or referencing the character of John Bruce through actual cases or issues he's been involved in, I've pretty much kept references of any sort of games out of this issue.
Daddy G, however, appears to have an unhealthy association with gaming, despite his prior claims otherwise.
Pathetic. Just pathetic.
Andrew
You sir, are my hero!
I have rarely seen a more withering retort to a fool in all my time!
At Big G, heres a question for you. If you're SO concerned with your son, regardless of anything else, why are you using a lawyer about to be dis-barred.
Regardless of your views on the legal system, this man is going down. If you really cared, i mean REALLY cared, you'd be doing your best by your son, which means not getting a lawyer with so much baggage.
Unless of course, you can't find another lawyer willing to take on the case
Laugh now CRY later gents!!
Watch for the surprise ending!! Thomson and Inmate Gorman DID meet on Oct 3rd. Just watch and wait then CRY.
Take some of your own advice.
And also, learn how to spell and, well... NOT act like a 10-year-old when posting on the internet. Specifically a law blog. You're a grown man, for crying out loud. Try to at least look the part.