Trackbacks

• Trackbacks are closed for this entry.

Comments

Page: 1 of 2

• 1/3/2009 10:20 PM Anonymous wrote:
  Kolin, Colin, this blog is so confusing
  
• 1/4/2009 9:33 AM Gary wrote:
  Shame on you MARTY! A vile crook as a Judge --- REMOVED FROM FAMILY - IN CIVIL ----
  
  A SERIAL CASE FIXER --- NO FAMILY NO FRIENDS. ONLY HENRY, CAROL, KELLY.....
  
  THE MOST HATED JUDGE IN PALM BEACH COUNTY BY ALL HIS PEERS ---- HATED AND LOATHED.....
  
  SHAME ON YOU MARTY!
  
• 1/4/2009 9:48 AM Jack Thompson, Once and Future Attorney (Trust Me) wrote:
  John B. Thompson, J.D.
  5721 Riviera Drive
  Coral Gables, Florida 33146
  305-666-4366
  amendmentone@comcast.net
  
  January 4, 2009
  
  Special Agent in Charge
  Federal Bureau of Investigation
  Jacksonville Office
  Suite 200
  7820 Arlington Expressway
  Jacksonville, Florida 32211
  
  Re: Criminal Alteration of Public Supreme Court Docket, Obstruction of Justice
  
  Dear Sir:
  
  On December 22, 2008, the following docket entry appeared in Florida Supreme Court Case No. SC07-80, which is still an “open” case, as the docket itself indicates:
  
  12/22/2008 MOTION-STAY (VACATE) PE John Bruce Thompson 231665 BY: PE John Bruce Thompson 231665 FILED AS MOTION TO VACATE REFEREE'S REPORT
  
  I now find, this week, that the Supreme Court’s Clerk, Tom Hall, has illegally wiped the docket clean of this important filing as indicated by what now currently appears in the Supreme Court’s docket, which shows the following as supposedly the last docket entry two months ago:
  
  10/29/2008 AFFIDAVIT/STATEMENT OF COSTS CO The Florida Bar FB BY: CO Sheila Marie Tuma 196223 - (FINAL)
  
  Florida courts have exhaustively and repeatedly held that altering court dockets is a criminal act. Here is a link to recent news coverage in Florida of this resolved issue: http://www.miamiherald.com/522/story/436061.html
  
  The Florida Supreme Court and its Clerk have stripped its docket of this pleading in my case because the pleading helps reveal criminal fraud, perjury, etc., by The Florida Bar and others. This pleading also exposes a far wider practice by the Florida Supreme Court and its Justices of stripping its official court files of pleadings filed with the Supreme Court, all in clear violation of Florida law. Remarkably, I have correspondence from the Court admitting that it is doing this.
  
  It appears that one reason this has been done by the Florida Supreme Court and its Clerk, Tom Hall, is that the widespread misconduct of The Florida Bar and the Florida Supreme Court is ill be addressed by February 22 in the United States Supreme Court. In other words, we now have the highest court in Florida altering, phonying up, deleting items from its own court docket in order to cover-up its wrongdoing.
  
  This is shocking.
  
  I would ordinarily go to the state criminal justice system about this, but when the highest court in our state is involved in criminal activity, a federal solution, which is authorized, as you know, by law, would appear to be the way to go.
  
  Please advise that a formal criminal investigation of this criminal activity by the Florida Supreme Court has been opened. I and others will give your Agents sworn statements and evidentiary proof in these regards. Thank you.
  
  Regards, Jack Thompson
  
  Copy: Chief Justice Peggy Quince
  Jack Harkness, Executive Director, The Florida Bar
  The Honorable Clarence Thompson, Justice, U.S. Supreme Court,
  c/o William K. Suter, Supreme Court Clerk
  
• 1/4/2009 10:26 AM Stephanie38DD wrote:
  @Gary a/k/a "Mr. Multiple Blog-Tags:
  
  I'm disappointed in you. Thoroughly disappointed in you. I took the time and effort to advise you against posting the same rubbish over and over and over and over again, and what's the very next thing you do? You post more of the same rubbish. As President of the National Association of Professional Cluster-Posters, I must inform you that the abysmal level of skill which you bring to the high art of cluster posting forces my decision that any application on your part for membership in the NAPPC will be summarily rejected. We've never let an amateur hack join our ranks and as long as I have any say in the matter, we never will.
  
• 1/4/2009 10:28 AM DavCube wrote:
  Skipping out on church to send your bile everywhere, Mr. Thompson? You should see someone about that obsession of yours with this website.
  
• 1/4/2009 10:34 AM Florida Supreme Court Docket wrote:
  @Jack Thompson:
  
  Now, you see me.
  
  Now, you don't. Psssych!!
  
• 1/4/2009 11:01 AM Florida Supreme Court Docket wrote:
  The Florida Supreme Court Docket
  500 South Duval Street
  Tallahassee FL 32399-1927
  (850) 488-0125
  docket@flcourts.org
  
  January 4, 2009
  
  Special Agent in Charge
  Federal Bureau of Investigation
  Jacksonville Office
  Suite 200
  7820 Arlington Expressway
  Jacksonville, Florida 32211
  
  Re: John B. Thompson Letter re: Criminal Alteration of Public Supreme Court Docket, Obstruction of Justice
  
  Dear Sir:
  
  I write to call you attention to some potentially relevant facts omitted, perhaps conveniently, from Mr. Thompson's letter to you of January 4, 2009.
  
  By standing order of the Florida Supreme Court, no filings of Mr. Thompson are to entered on me unless the filing is made upon the signature of an attorney both admitted to practice in the State of Florida and in good standing with the Florida Bar. Mr. Thompson's Motion to Vacate was not, as required by this order, signed by an attorney both admitted to practice in the State of Florida and in good standing with the Florida Bar.
  
  I suspect you may find these facts relevant to your handling of Mr. Thompson's complaint.
  
  Sincerely,
  
  The Florida Supreme Court Docket
  
  Copy: John B. Thompson
  Chief Justice Peggy Quince
  Jack Harkness, Executive Director, The Florida Bar
  The Honorable Clarence Thompson, Justice, U.S. Supreme Court,
  c/o William K. Suter, Supreme Court Clerk
  
• 1/4/2009 11:30 AM Stephanie38DD wrote:
  @Gary a/k/a "Mr. Multiple Blog-Tags":
  
  If you weren't already aware, then be advised that many of the members of the organization I head, the National Association of Professional Cluster-Posters, offer ghost-writing services to those, like yourself, who are clueless as to how to properly and effectively cluster post. If you are interested in employing the services of a professional cluster-poster to ghost write your posts for you -- and, frankly, you should be -- don't hesitate to contact me. I'd be more than happy to refer you to any number of our members whom I'm confident can provide you that much needed service.
  
• 1/4/2009 11:37 AM Fred Furrier wrote:
  TO ALL BLOGGERS:
  
  HAVE YOU BEEN WRONGED BY HENRY HANDLER, HOWARD WEISS & CAROL A. KARTAGENER of the Boca Raton Law Firm of WEISS & HANDLER?
  
  PERJURY, BILL CHURNING, FRAUD BILLING, Malicious PROSECUTION and PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS THAT WERE LIES??? SEE KASMAN v. KASMAN for perjury by Carol Kartagener.
  
  FILE Your COMPLAINTS with the Following:
  
  THE FLORIDA BAR
  651 E. Jefferson Street
  Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2300
  1-866-352-0707 (ACAP)
  
  ATTN: John Jay White, President
  
  cc: FDLE
  US ATTY -- West Palm Beach, Fl
  FBI - SAC -- Miami, Fl
  
  FILE YOUR COMPLAINTS NOW! WEISS & HANDLER is a corrupt Law Firm! FILE YOUR CHARGES NOW!
  
• 1/4/2009 11:52 AM Mnementh2230 wrote:
  owned!
  
• 1/4/2009 11:52 AM The Miami Office of the FBI wrote:
  @Fred Furrier:
  
  You're certainly free to encourage others to file complaints with our Office. And all are certainly free to file complaints with our Office. However, you should be aware that we anticipate that the full resources of our Office will, of necessity, be dedicated to processing complaints from Jack Thompson until at least the fourth quarter of 2009. Not until we've cleared this backlog can we turn our attention to other matters.
  
• 1/4/2009 12:05 PM jccalhoun wrote:
  "is ill be addressed by February 22"
  that's good typering there Jacko...
  
• 1/4/2009 12:37 PM Zerodash wrote:
  Jackie-boys' little conspiracy gets a little deeper now. You know, the fact that you did the same crap during your disbarment hearings that got you into trouble didn't help your case. had you acted like a sane adult professional during that time, you probably would still be a lawyer now.
  
  The fact that you continue your poor behavior will only guarantee that you will never be a lawyer again.
  
  Grow up and get a life, Thompson.
  
• 1/4/2009 12:54 PM GONK wrote:
  ... by God you're a cretin, Mr Thompson.
  
  If you honestly think you can win back your law license by repeating the same moronic, treacherous, infantile, dishonest and just plain demonic behavior that got you permanemtly disbarred to begin with, you really do need a large hammer to beat some sense into that malformed, three-inch-thick skull of yours.
  
  And don't think that misquoting your precious Bible you never bothered to actually read will help any - no merciful God would ever allow mindless death cultists like you to spread your hate-mongering, snuff-loving ways "in their name" for so many years.
  
• 1/4/2009 1:22 PM calling Dr. Blanchart! wrote:
  Wow, and just when I thought it couldn't get any better, it does. Not that I can understand the ramblings of the criminally insane, but it makes for pretty funny reading anyway. IS THERE A DOCTOR IN THE HOUSE?
  
• 1/4/2009 1:26 PM United States Code wrote:
  It is a federal crime, punishable by up to 5 or 8 years of imprisonment, to knowingly and willfully make a false report to the Federal Bureau of Investigation:
  
  18 USC §1001.
  
  (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
  (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
  (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
  (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
  shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
  
• 1/4/2009 1:30 PM Dr. Blanchart wrote:
  @calling Dr. Blanchart!:
  
  Hello? Yes, this is Dr. Blanchart. How can I help you?
  
• 1/4/2009 1:39 PM Back to Doc Blanchart wrote:
  Please advise what possible mental illnesses could be at work here in the number of postings by one Mr. Jack in furtherance of the obsessive compulsive traits evidenced above. Thank you in advance for your help. You do your community great service.
  
• 1/4/2009 1:58 PM Dr. Blanchart wrote:
  @Back to Doc Blanchart:
  
  How coincidental that you would ask! As we speak, Random Nonsense House Publishing is poised to release my latest book, "Jack Thompson: The Worse Case of Narcissistic Personality Disorder I've Encountered in My Entire Professional Career." I'll be making the rounds at morning talk shows this coming week. Including Oprah. Try to catch me discussing my book, if you can. I'll be offering my views on the fascinating but frightenly crazy-assed mind of Mr. Thompson. And, of course, you should pick up a copy of my book. Available at Barnes & Noble and other retailers nationwide. But, foretold, forewarned: it's not a subject for the faint of heart or the weak of stomach.
  
• 1/4/2009 3:34 PM fakelegalzoom.com wrote:
  @William K. Suter, Supreme Court Clerk:
  
  Dear Mr. Suter:
  
  Please be advised that fakelegalzoom.com offers a variety of computerized docket entry forms which we are confident will make your Office's docket management functions simple, fast, and easy. Feel free to visit our website and view our complete line of products at fakelegalzoom.com. I have included below a sample of our typical docket entry form.
  
  Sincerely,
  
  Fake Robert Shapiro, Esq.
  _________________________
  
  No. 08A554
  Title: John Bruce Thompson, Applicant
  v.
  The Bar of Florida
  
  Docketed:
  Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Florida
  Case Nos.: (07-80, 07-354)
  
  ~~Date~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~
  
  Dec 18 2008 Application (08A554) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 24, 2008 to February 22, 2009, submitted to Justice Thomas.
  Dec 24 2008 Application (08A554) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until February 22, 2009.
  Jan 10 2009 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. .
  Jan 21 2009 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of Feb 15, 2009.
  Feb 15 2009 Petition DENIED.
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  ~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Attorneys for Petitioner:
  John Bruce Thompson
  5721 Riviera Drive
  Coral Gables, FL 33146
  Party name: John Bruce Thompson
  
• 1/4/2009 8:14 PM Dog Welder wrote:
  Jack,
  
  Would it make you feel better if they put it back on the docket and the DENIED the motion like they did your previous thousand or so filings?
  
• 1/4/2009 8:15 PM Wacky Jacky wrote:
  How fitting that he has become a total mockery, and that no matter what he posts, when he posts it, or to whom he posts it, his words are scoffed at. He has yelled so long no one can hear anything he says. He has become a relic, a laughingstock, an annoyance, an infection, and a joke so large no one cares other than to rightfully demean him. Then he tries to call others idiots. We ought to take bets on how soon he is locked up by something called the baker act. May have to rename it the Thompson Law.
  
• 1/4/2009 8:34 PM Same Difference wrote:
  Dog Welder:
  
  That's an excellent point, my man. It's about the equivanlent of asking whether you'd prefer that I sneak into your house in the dead of night and silently slit your throat while you sleep or whether you would prefer that I drag you out of house and hang you by the neck 'til dead in the town square before a mob of cheering town folk. At the end of the day, it don't really make no difference which one you preferred.
  
• 1/4/2009 9:04 PM Anonymous wrote:
  Ah, but in this case, it's someone who wants to be dragged out in front of the crowd, because (a) it makes him think he is some kind of martyr, though I haven't got the faintest idea as to what he would be a martyr to, other than terminal stupidity, and (b) has gone beyond the point of 'right' or 'wrong' and is now simply concerned about not losing the spotlight he so adores.
  
  Why else would Thompson always post his little self-gratifications on the top story, completely regardless of what the actual topic of the story is? Because, as far as Thompson is concerned, the world was created purely to give him something to stand on, and we are only here to be recipients of his 'mighty legal prowess'.
  
  Obviously, in Jack's eyes, the single most important event that is occurring in Florida is his disbarment and his flailing and gum-gnashing attempts to get revenge on the people that finally brought his behaviour to light.
  
• 1/5/2009 12:01 AM Mnementh2230 wrote:
  I'm going to laugh my ass off when the SCOTUS denies Jacky his pathetic little appeal.
  
  Somewhere I've got a picture of me and ApokalypseNow hoisting Guiness and eating Smores (which were roasted over the smouldering remains of Jack's career).
  
• 1/6/2009 12:57 AM anaoymous wrote:
  Yeah--take that Jack--we don't need no stinking Haines v. Koerner, here--We're the supreme Court Docket--we Rule the WORLD, you dirty dog. Equal protection of your rights as a pro se do not exist in florida--got that, Jack We, the mighty OZ have spoken--pay no atention to the daggers behing the cloaks.
  
  Gufaw, gufaw!!!!!!
  
• 1/6/2009 1:39 AM Anonymous wrote:
  Yeah, you know, God forbid Jack should actually have to follow the letter of Supreme Court orders or anything, after all, what Jack thinks the world should be like is far more important than things like the Law of the Land that the rest of us have to follow.
  
  If you saturate a Supreme Court docket with over 200 filings, including pictures of Gay Porn, then the last thing you should expect are sanctions, you should be allowed to post anything that happens to drift into your mind into a court docket, and write to News agencies accusing anyone of anything you want without evidence and without expecting any kind of comeback...
  
  Gufaw gufaw...
  
• 1/6/2009 2:01 AM special treatment for lawyers? wrote:
  Im not a lawyer, adn if I talked to the bar like this Thomspon, id be in trouble
  
  why should lawyers get specail treatment?
  
• 1/6/2009 2:10 AM Anonymous wrote:
  To be fair, John Bruce Thompson is not a lawyer.
  
• 1/6/2009 2:27 AM special treatment for lawyers? wrote:
  but he was a laywer and some of his budies still think teh rules should be diffrent for him than for us
  
  its like a club were nornal ppl dont matter becase they are just money with legs
  

Page: 1 of 2

Leave a comment

Comments are closed.