NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTION: "NO MORE SOB-STORIES"

(UPDATE: Judge Ireland disqualified herself.  Tell your clients, and pray the computer doesn't reassign the case to Judge Seidman's division.)

Judge Ireland will rule at 1:30 PM on two Motions for Disqualification filed this morning.  The relevant facts:


"1.  On January 9, 2009, after the conclusion of a routine calendar call, Assistant Public Defender Meritxell Ros made a comment to this Court that many trials were set for the following week.

2.  In response, this Court went off the record and said "if you haven't noticed my New Year's resolution is no more sob-stories."

3.  After Ms. Ros said she did notice the change in attitude, this Court stated that if a Defendant loses at trial "it's an adjudication."

4.  After Ms. Ros stated that an adjudication after trial may be reasonable, this Court stated, "and they're going to jail."

5.  As Ms. Ros and this Court continued talking, this Court stated "if you lose on a DUI, you're not getting 'first mins.'"

6.  Ms. Ros then asked this Court if a Defendant were to lose on a constructive possession of marijuana case would this Court impose jail.  To which this Court responded if he is found guilty "he is going to jail.""

                                                        Motion For Disqualification Of Judge

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 1/13/2009 1:17 PM Anonymous wrote:
    So either she wanted to go to civil or she just "Goldstein"'ed herself. See ya later Judge!!
  • 1/13/2009 1:29 PM Off the record is the problem wrote:
    Judge should not be allowed to go off the record. All courtrooms should be electronically recorded. Every word should be recorded so judges and lawyers can't wink and nod at each other to cover their butts. If this pd hadn't been an honest lawyer this would have been swept under the carpet because it was off the record.
  • 1/13/2009 1:31 PM Anonymous wrote:
    How much you want to bet the prosecutors didn't hear anything?
  • 1/13/2009 1:36 PM trial tax wrote:
    zzzzzzzz so what. like labarga she is only guilty of telling the truth. judges hold grudges and whack people after trial. you want justice ask halle berry for his forwarding address.
  • 1/13/2009 1:55 PM Coffee tea or me? wrote:
    Time to pump up the old air mattress. Phrapp!!
  • 1/13/2009 2:00 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Send her back to civil, the land of broken toys.
  • 1/13/2009 2:01 PM judicial blunders wrote:
    Gee, if I knew what I was doing I'd really be dangerous!
  • 1/13/2009 2:23 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Was the prosecutor in the courtroom still? Is Lee Cohen putting the fear of County Court into the prosecutor to not say anything.
  • 1/13/2009 2:43 PM Jack Thompson, Once and Future Attorney (Trust Me) wrote:
    JACK THOMPSON COMPLETELY VINDICATED:

    Ohio Teen Killed Mom Over Video Game
    By M.R. KROPKO
    ,
    AP
    posted: 3 HOURS 41 MINUTES AGO
    comments: 1465
    filed under: Crime News, National News
    Print Share
    Text SizeAAA
    ELYRIA, Ohio (Jan. 13) - Although a teenager's obsession with a violent video game may have warped his sense of reality, the boy is guilty of murdering his mother and wounding his father after they took "Halo 3" away from him, a judge ruled Monday.

    "I firmly believe that Daniel Petric had no idea at the time he hatched this plot that if he killed his parents they would be dead forever," Lorain County Common Pleas Judge James Burge said.


    http://news.aol.com/article/ohio-teen-killed-mom-over-video-game/302589?icid=200100125x1216096180x1201054128
  • 1/13/2009 2:52 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Is she up in 2010? I hear she is retiring. Ireland - gone; Lazarus- gone
  • 1/13/2009 2:54 PM Jack Thompson, Once and Future Attorney (Trust Me) wrote:
    Regarding the "Freedom of Expression" YouTube offering, to the left, by Tom Trento, these Palestinian sympathizers have absolutely no "right" to utter their "fighting words" and then menace, with physical movement toward, the pro-Israel folks.

    Freedom of expression is surrendered by people like this, and I commend the police for doing the right thing. Jack Thompson

    PS: It's interesting that it was Christians who are identified as being on the other side of the street. But for Bible believing Christians in the United States, Israel would be in dire straits, and I am delighted to count myself as an evangelical Christian who knows that the Bible is still true: That Jews are God's chosen people and always will be.
  • 1/13/2009 2:56 PM WehrGeist wrote:
    JACK THOMPSON COMPLETELY OFF HIS NUT:


    Read the whole article a$$clown. Don't just post the headline and parts you like.
  • 1/13/2009 3:04 PM wobbler wrote:
    She just can't keep her mouth shut. You should have seen her this morning.
  • 1/13/2009 3:08 PM Tarosan wrote:
    Who believes in the words of a failure in life who's going on like a broken record?
  • 1/13/2009 3:12 PM Dog Welder wrote:
    Jack, here's the rest of the article:

    "Nonetheless, Burge rejected the defense attorneys' argument that Petric, 17, was not guilty by reason of insanity.
    The defense didn't contest that Petric shot his parents in October 2007 after they took the game away from him, but insisted that the teen's youth and addiction made him less responsible.
    Petric may have been addicted, but the evidence also showed he planned the crime for weeks, said Burge, who found the teenager guilty of aggravated murder, attempted aggravated murder and other charges.
    Tried as an adult, Petric faces a maximum possible penalty of life in prison without parole. The judge didn't set a sentencing date.
    The teen's mother, Susan Petric, 43, died of a gunshot wound to the head. Her husband, Mark Petric, a minister at New Life Assembly of God in Wellington, also was shot in the head but survived.
    After the verdict was announced, Petric turned to look at his father seated behind him in the courtroom. Mark Petric, who previously said he has forgiven his son, gave an encouraging nod."

    Nice try, jackass.
  • 1/13/2009 3:24 PM Double Dutch Bus wrote:
    Ezay Azay Jeezy iza Dizouble Dezutch! Dizouble Dezutch! Jizack Tizomzison iza creazy! Creazy!
  • 1/13/2009 3:33 PM DavCube wrote:
    Mr. Thompson, are you COMPLETELY illiterate? That defense was thrown out, if you didn't look at the article on gamepolitics.

    Plus, this does not 'vindicate' you. You had absolutely nothing to do with that case, so your CONDUCT, which was why you were disbarred, was nonexistant with it.
  • 1/13/2009 3:52 PM Bar Jack Thompson's IP wrote:
    Jack Thompson ruins another thread. How come he can't stick to Jaablog Welcome?
  • 1/13/2009 4:12 PM Jack Thompson, Attorney who really wishes it was a gay bar wrote:
    @Bar Jack Thompson's IP

    Because that would be the grown up mature thing to do and we all know Jack has never acted like a grown up
  • 1/13/2009 4:13 PM BearDogg-X wrote:
    @ Jack Thompson, Former Attorney and Current Metropolitian Moron of Miami(Can't Trust You and Never Will)

    A day late and a dollar short, retard. The Judge throughly rejected the so-called "video game addiction defense", saying that it wasn't a defense. So, no, you weren't "vindicated" at all.

    Practice what you preach: Grow up and get a life, sack of Grade-A monkey feces.
  • 1/13/2009 4:22 PM Neeneko wrote:
    I don't know, I'm starting to read these cases like 'having a father who is a pastor in a concevative evangelical church causes one to kill'.

    The correlation seems might higher then video games. Given the amount of abuse and attempted suicides I've seen in such households, perhaps that is the real public menace?
  • 1/13/2009 4:24 PM Neeneko wrote:
    You do realize that much of the support for Israel comes from people hoping that violence in the middle east will usher in the end times and bring about the end of the world?

    Next step is rebuilding the temple I recall? That alone will probably start a war.
  • 1/13/2009 4:27 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Even when they ram boats with American Senators in?

    What about the USS Liberty? Do you agree with that little incident as well?

    I wish the world was as black and white as your little fantasy land Jack.
  • 1/13/2009 4:29 PM Anonymous wrote:
    You Idiot...
  • 1/13/2009 4:40 PM Dog Welder wrote:
    1) Cynthia McKookiepants isn't currently in office. She also wasn't a senator.

    2) That boat was flying a Hamas flag when it was rammed by an Isaeli ship.

    3) That boat ignored radio calls from the Israeli ship to turn back.

    I suppose they could have just blasted it out of the water as an alternative to ramming it.
  • 1/13/2009 4:54 PM The Three-Edged Sword wrote:
    I'll accept Israel's right to defend its people, with lethal force if needed, I don't have a problem with that, but I wouldn't take either sides comments as being entirely truthful to be honest, they say the first casualty of War is the truth, that's possibly something that needs to be considered by Anonymous at 4:27 as well.

    My real pity, however, is with the Palestinian people, Hamas don't really seem to care about their fate, and Israel are being too over-zealous in their shelling for my tastes. And for anyone trying to claim that they 'voted in Hamas', I'd recommend you look to Bin Ladens' comments following 9/11 about how the American People 'voted in' the Administration and were therefore viable targets.
  • 1/13/2009 4:55 PM Anonymous wrote:
    She didn't "Goldstein" herself. No one wanted to go before Goldstein. A one way ticket out was good. Ireland is just a little batty but not mean in sentencing. No one else will file the motions.
  • 1/13/2009 4:58 PM Ban Thompson wrote:
    "Because that would be the grown up mature thing to do and we all know Jack has never acted like a grown up"

    No, the reason he jumps threads is he thinks people actually read his nonsense and that it's too hard to find once a certain amount of posts have gone up.

    Typical megalomaniac.
  • 1/13/2009 5:03 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Well, since he's been banned from almost everywhere else for an almost mirror image of what he is doing here, i.e. attempting to turn the entire blog into the 'Jack Thompson Show', yes, I agree that he should be booted, the only responses he ever gets are people telling him his mistakes anyway, so it'd be interesting how he would fare with less people to proof-read the garbage that he considers to be legal documents.
  • 1/13/2009 5:19 PM Anonymous wrote:
    How many threads does Jack have to infect before he is banned?
  • 1/13/2009 5:33 PM Miami's Rumpole wrote:
    http://justicebuilding.blogspot.com/2009/01/come-on-intake-seat.html

    The Justice Building Blog

    UPDATE: We often opine that the ides of January are the worst time to try a case, as prosecutors and judges are busy working on their new year's resolutions to send more defendants to jail. Now comes this from the Broward Blog that North of the Border Judge Ireland has confirmed that indeed her new years resolution was to send more defendants to jail. "No more sob stories" she roared in court the other day.

    How many times does an appellate court need to remind a trial judge that YOU CAN'T HAVE A POLICY OF SENDING EVERY DEFENDANT WHO LOSES A TRIAL TO JAIL?

    Listen up you robed readers: considering all factors in arriving at a just sentence is what they pay you for. Do you get the fact that any idiot can total up a score sheet and throw someone in prison, but it takes a learned and skilled Judge to arrive at a just sentence?

    OK, I realize that the "any idiot" phrase cuts a little too close to home when talking about north of the border. But still, just how long do you have to sit on bench before you start losing common sense? Is it the altitude? Is the daily wearing of black that just eventually blackens your mood? What is it that finally and consistently causes just about any and every judge to eventually lose their common sense and just try and put as many people as humanly possible in prison? Really, we want to know. Maybe you guys need term limits. Hmmm....there's a thought. Put every judge on the bench with the knowledge that in ten or fifteen years they have to go back to being a lowly lawyer.
  • 1/13/2009 5:37 PM Snoop Dogg wrote:
    Fizzle Uzzy C-to-tha-izzle Kizzy Jack Thompson.
  • 1/13/2009 5:59 PM Dog Welder wrote:
    I agree that there are no good guys in this. Innocent people are getting caught up in the crossfire, and that's never a good thing.

    I did see a picture of the boat (post ramming) and they still had the Hamas flag on it. I can't seem to find the link now. All things considered, if you were bringing in humanitarian aid, you might want to fly a more neutral flag on your boat.
  • 1/13/2009 6:02 PM The Three-Edged Sword wrote:
    Can't argue with that, kinda like heading to the Dunkirk Landings flying a swastika... Not a wise idea..
  • 1/13/2009 6:22 PM Anonymous wrote:
    jack, Would you please stop bothering us. We absolutely thing you are a fucking idiot and not worthy of our time. GO BOTHER SOMEONE ELSE!
  • 1/13/2009 7:27 PM Anonymous wrote:
    County courtooms ARE electronically recorded... but the judge has the on/off button at the bench.
  • 1/13/2009 7:40 PM Kincyr wrote:
    JACK THOMPSON DECLARED A LYING SOB:

    he never played the game, his parents took it from him as soon as he got home after purchasing it.
    http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2008/12/boy_killed_mom_and_shot_dad_ov.html

    "'I firmly believe that Daniel Petric had no idea at the time he hatched this plot that if he killed his parents they would be dead forever,' Lorain County Common Pleas Judge James Burge said."

    no duh, Daniel Petric's a christian, he believes in that "eternal life in heaven" nonsense
  • 1/13/2009 8:09 PM Kincyr wrote:
    if the Bible is certainly true, then if you really, really believe in Jesus and you want to prove to anyone the power of belief, you only need to drink a deadly poison and, according to Jesus, it will not harm you.

    However, I would not be so quick to trust Jesus, as in the last page of the Bible, he says "I am the root and offspring of David, and the bright and morning star." (Revelation 22:16)

    This verse presents the most shocking revelation in the entire Bible. On the very last page, it reveals Jesus as the "bright and morning star". In other words, Lucifer-- Satan!

    In Isaiah 14:12, St. Jerome, translated the Hebrew "morning star" into the Latin term "Lucifer" (light bearer), a name commonly ascribed to Satan by Christians, and represents the fallen star, an ancient symbol for the fallen or evil one. The mourning star actually appears as the planet Venus, the brightest "star" in the sky (but the ancients did not know about planets). Venus always appears low on the horizon, thus it looked like a fallen star (fallen angel) to the believers.

    Although the Isaiah verse describes the fallen king of Babylon, Christians have, for centuries, ascribed Satan as taking many forms. And what more powerful form could an evil being take than to pretend himself as the saviour of the world? This would certainly explain the hate filled verses attributed to Jesus and the blind followers who inherit ignorance. Thus, a conclusion, based on Christian beliefs of Satan, and the belief in the "inerrancy" of the Bible, one must conclude that Jesus has revealed himself as Satan!

    What a Revelation! No wonder the Jews chose to kill Jesus on the cross.
  • 1/13/2009 9:07 PM Banishment to Ireland wrote:
    Ireland should go back to Ireland if that's where she's from. Preferably some place really cold and wet. She's all washed up come election time.
    Bet on it. If she's stupid enough to make a statement like that, she has no business on the bench, let alone hearing criminal cases.
    But there's little room to send another errant judge off to civil. Civil is all filled up with other errant judges. You gotta admit, Broward is a real judicial pig sty by any standards.
  • 1/13/2009 10:38 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Ireland should just retire. She's obviously not happy, nor evidently from this story particularly stable.
  • 1/13/2009 11:17 PM Anonymous wrote:
    She's another disgrace to the bench. And an unfortunate run in with her on the 7th floor at the 110, she yelled in the lunch line at a man and his spouse, knowing exactly who she is, stood her ground and told her "relax judge". Ireland shut up at that point
  • 1/14/2009 10:03 AM Ireland Needs a Big Wake Up Call wrote:
    Some of these clowns need to go. Being a judge one should be able to expect certain requirements. One of them is to act judicially. She has failed this litmus test. Nobody ever thought she was very bright, but this sort of behavior coming from a judge either in Broward County or anywhere else is completely unacceptable. I don't are whether she is now crying over this mistake or not. She should have known better. Does anybody know when her term is up?
  • 1/15/2009 11:27 AM Ireland Launch wrote:
    Boy, she's done it now. She may as well just advertised for opposition when her terms up. She's not crazy, just been on the bench for too long. It happens allot.
  • 1/15/2009 5:13 PM Anonymous wrote:
    2010
  • 1/15/2009 5:46 PM Anonymous wrote:
    does anyone really think being unreasonable is grounds to lose an election? If so, why did Futch keep getting re-elected? How about Streitfeld ? (he must have been a piece of work when he was in Criminal)
    Another great example: Marks who was SCREAMING at some litigants in a civil case.
  • 1/15/2009 8:37 PM Anonymous wrote:
    To 5:46, Judge Marks is a cartoon villain from a bad Disney movie.
  • 1/15/2009 11:41 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Or Shapiro? The P.D. stance was "put up with it as long as they don't hurt the client.' Those little 'civility' signs are a bad joke.
  • 1/22/2009 8:28 AM Do Your Research wrote:
    "Off the record is the problem wrote:
    Judge should not be allowed to go off the record. All courtrooms should be electronically recorded. Every word should be recorded so judges and lawyers can't wink and nod at each other to cover their butts. If this pd hadn't been an honest lawyer this would have been swept under the carpet because it was off the record."

    Many courtrooms are electronically recorded and judges have control of the record going on and off.

    Besides, there are some judges AND attorneys who do still run their mouths knowing full well the record is on. It doesn't stop them.

    Your point it mute....so to speak.
  • 1/22/2009 10:07 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Futch and Streifeld never got oppossition, but the times they are a changing.........
  • 1/22/2009 10:09 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Shapiro never got opposition.

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Comments are closed.