"SHE LIED ON THE STAND"



*UPDATE* -
VIDEO: Whistleblower Alu says former judge lied on stand

"She lied in her deposition. She lied to the JQC. She lied on the stand," said Sunrise City Commissioner and state prosecutor Sheila Alu.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Get your Tivo's runnin'.

Sheila Alu reportedly gave Bob Norman a very candid interview regarding the funky Gardiner trial earlier this afternoon.  It's set to run at 5:30 PM tonight, or possibly at 6:00 PM, depending on scheduling. 

We'll be sure to link it as soon as it posts ...

Coming Soon - The Trial Transcript, and then The Press Conference!

Bob Norman's Blog - Former judge defines what "social" means

"One problem with Gardiner's claim on the witness stand that she never talked about the trial is that at least two witnesses who testified under oath to the JQC that they personally witnessed the judge and prosecutor talking about the case while partying together at the Timpano Chophouse on Las Olas Boulevard before a verdict was reached. I'll be reporting on that aspect of the case against Gardiner today, so stay tuned."

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 3
  • 11/30/2012 6:36 PM Appointed Judges wrote:
    What a shame. So many people would love to be a judge and they would be an honor to the Broward bench. We all know who they are even if someone ridicules or put them down. There are people that have campaigned their guts out to be one and spent their own money and this Judge who has it all just throws it all away. Makes you wonder HOW someone like this Chief Criminal Judge became a judge and some other honorable soul does not. Maybe that is the problem, how they get there should make you wonder. I am against the appointment process for this reason.
    Reply to this
  • 11/30/2012 6:41 PM Anonymous wrote:
    She got there because of the support of the type of political people who advocated for her before judge Crow. Some were there both times. Likely Sheriff Jenne would have been in West Palm too if he hadn't been busted.

    Makes for a lot of questions which should be asked, and answered for a change.
    Reply to this
  • 11/30/2012 6:45 PM Anonymous wrote:
    You could not have explained it better. I was unaware of all the people that testified for this judge from our courthouse until I just read the sunsentinel article. What an embarrassment to our Judiciary and it appears they do not even care.
    Reply to this
  • 11/30/2012 6:47 PM Joyce Julian wrote:
    Surprised joyce julian did not testify? We all know why.
    Reply to this
  • 11/30/2012 6:59 PM Anonymous wrote:
    What about the other prosecutor mentioned in the New Times? Why didn't he testify?
    Reply to this
  • 11/30/2012 7:32 PM wonderer wrote:
    Better yet--if the Bar was serious, why did they NOT put Alu on the stand-even as a rebuttal witness? Why was this omission done?
    Reply to this
  • 11/30/2012 7:42 PM Lying Judge wrote:
    When a judge lies, very bad things happen
    Reply to this
  • 11/30/2012 9:00 PM Anonymous wrote:
    lets have the names of all who spoke up for her
    Reply to this
  • 11/30/2012 9:31 PM Anonymous wrote:
    "she's so wonderful oink oink oink oink......."
    Reply to this
  • 11/30/2012 9:53 PM SiliconeSheila wrote:
    There is not one thing real about Sheila Alu. From her fake boobs to her fake ethical indigniation at Gardiner to her fake support of Mike Satz... she is nothing more than a self-aggrandizing bag of manure. Why not resign from something worthwhile... like being a disingenuous shrew? That would be refreshing.
    Reply to this
  • 11/30/2012 10:28 PM Lol wrote:
    Oh so painful those hurtful comments about Alu. Now she won't be able to get out of bed all weekend.
    Reply to this
  • 11/30/2012 10:32 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Maybe Ana can become one of the Police Women Of Broward County while she waits to apply for readmission?
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 12:16 AM CK wrote:
    I love Dave B., but I wondering if he beleives to "social" hogwash?
    He either sipped the Kool Aide or Ana gave him a wink and a nod when is came to trial prep on the "social" issue.
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 1:18 AM Uncougar wrote:
    Taking one look at Ms. Alu on Channel 10 tonight shows that she is taking the role of grandmother very very seriously. Hey granny, can you say "botox?"
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 7:33 AM Anonymous wrote:
    As always, Sexism is alive and well on this blog.
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 11:05 AM Sheila was not subpoenaed wrote:
    The bar prosecutor had no idea what she was doing. What a farce! Why not call Sheila to testify? Clearly because the fix is in!
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 11:48 AM Right on Ck wrote:
    I wonder how many texts and calls went between Bogey and Ana right before Bogey dumped his wife. I am sure Mary was ok with the fact they were all "social" or work related. After the Cialis kicked in I am sure Ana gave a lot more than a wink and a nod.
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 12:09 PM Anonymous wrote:
    I wish Charlie was still with us.
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 12:22 PM FLORIDA U KNOW THIS COURT wrote:
    FLORIDA U KNOW THIS COURT - IS INCOMPETENT INEPT & CORRUPT! - FUKTHISCOURT.COM

    JUDGE DAVID CROW NEEDS TO PUT THE
    "HONOR" BACK IN "HONORABLE" IN THE 17TH JUDICIAL COURT OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

    ANNA GARDINER NEEDS TO BE DISBARRED
    AND FORFEIT ANY PENSION DUE

    JUDGE DAVID CROW MUST SET AN EXAMPLE
    AND MAKE THOSE WHO WEAR JUDICIAL ROBES ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS AND MISCONDUCT

    FUKTHISCOURT.COM
    PART OF THE FUK (FLORIDA U KNOW) NETWORK OF SITES
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 2:27 PM Anonymous wrote:
    As was proved in the last election, when you play you pay.
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 6:30 PM Anna'sMouth wrote:
    If a Lawyer is not supposed to have sex with his client and Bogey and Anna are doing the wild thing should bogey get disbarred? Maybe Alu can file a complain with the Bar against Bogey. Or maybe after six more months when anna gains another 100 lbs. Bogey will find another judge to bang like Joyce julien. There is a lot of fodder here.
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 6:36 PM BAR rules wrote:
    SA Sheinberg got suspended for a year. Any suspension over 91 days means that they reapply to the bar. I don't see how she can get less than him since she was the one that committed the perjury. If she gets less than the SA it is all political.
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 8:47 PM anonymouseinthecourthouse wrote:
    Please, please, please do not lose sight of the issues--Gardiner lied; Gardiner routinely ogstructs justice and violates any rules within her reach and then lies about lying. she is unfit to live, let alone practice law in the bell jar of the bar rules v. the reality. Alu, regardless of he negative issues, exposed Gardiner and regardles of why--it is Gardiner's exposue that needs to be addressed--FUK Alu.
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 9:20 PM Fuk has a point about pension wrote:
    Why does former Judge Gardiner get to keep her pension? She cost the taxpayers like a million with the two trials. She disgraced everyone in the legal profession. Her license is irrelevant. Taxpayers paying her retirement is the issue.
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 9:38 PM Pathetic wrote:
    I have never seen a group of people who take so much joy in other people's misery. Are you lives so pathetic that you are reduced to celebrating another person's misfortunes? I don't agree with what Gardner did, but I am sickened by the orgasmic reactions to her ongoing distress. Grow up and stop the self-righteous grandstanding! Here is a new word for all of you.... e-m-p-a-t-h-y. Look it up and learn how to feel it for another human being. What's next... a coliseum with lions?
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 10:13 PM Anonymous wrote:
    You guys never get it, even as it happens over and over again. Do you think Bogey cuts the deal with the JQC without knowing giving up her golden ticket would go miles in her favor with the Bar. 0-90days suspension max. Dave and Ana probably have the honeymoon planned over the period of time. All we are seeing now if a cleaning up of the record. Crossing all I's and T's. You see the Bar isnt even trying to nail her. Sheinberg, an unconnected pawn that got screwed. Maybe Ana would have received the same but because she gave up the robe for life, that will be cause for mitigation. Dont you think Bogey and Co know that when that 90 days or less is handed out, it ends there. Alu will whine. Norman whose blog fan base in down to nothing, will rant, then what, nothing. Is there going to be picketing at Cole, Scott and Kissain? Please.

    Do I agree or justify any of this, no. But after awhile when the same pattern get repeated over and over again, it is hard not to see hitory repeating itself. Until the general public cares, these guys know they can pull this shit.
    Reply to this
  • 12/1/2012 11:00 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Lock her up
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 12:52 AM Annas Bo wrote:
    I bet Anna's bo D.B. must be very proud of his gal pal.

    Representing your honey doesn't make you the brightest crayon in the box, does it?
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 1:34 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Especially if you had to cut the big check to the first wife to be able to shack up with Ana. The guy is pushing 76-78 she is 20 years younger, with the miracles of modern medicine he figures it was worth the big check since he aint going to be around much longer to spend it, but at least he still gets his rocks off.
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 10:17 AM Empathy My Azz wrote:
    Empathy? For the woman who never displayed the same for any poor person appearing before her? The ROC was one thing, but what about the carnage in her regular division? MAX HER OUT I say and make sure she won't have the ability to lose her mind and embarrass the legal community in the future as she has done to the judiciary.
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 11:01 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Broward County hits a new low.
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 1:53 PM rukidding wrote:
    Hey Pathetic--you stoopid or sumpin? Who especially gardiner took pity or
    "e-m-p-a-t-h-y" on all her victims she lied in rulings about; deprived of liberty without due process or equal protection of law prohibiting those illegal sentences. What qabout thier "distress" then and continuing way beyond her initial damage? She didn't and won't get what is really coming to her. would you have been so empathic for Hitler? for Bundy? for Manson too. gardiner is a pure evil sociopath that needs to be loced away and YES I would absolutely revel in that along with her co-operatives rob carney, mike satz, scott raft and all the others who assisted and helped her out and covered her up. riddle me this--as the best criminal defense attorney in broward, what would he have done if she, as a judge, did that to one of his clients? would he have complained? condoned? protected her? or just settled for a few bones? does anyone know how many of his clients she screwed. you can play the jesus card as long as you were not actually destroyed by he her lies, her deceit, her criminal acts and her lies about her lies. she is a rabid dog and needs to be put down before she infects anyone else.
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 3:30 PM Pathetic wrote:
    Gardner was the judge in ROC court. In case you didn't check, the sentencing is a bit tougher in there. Can anyone please tell me about any substantiated lies she told about defendants in her role as a judge? Can anyone show me evidence that her proclivity for texting Schienberg affected her rulings in any manner? Did Tenzer express his outrage over the Court's rulings prier to learning of her texting of the prosecutor? People are not so dichotomous. We are all combinations of good traits, not so good traits, and for some... bad traits. However, the incredibly myopic focus involving a judge that rose to the position of head of the criminal bench being compared to Hitler and Bundy exactly proves my point. Again... pathetic, juvenile, and misdirected.
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 4:26 PM Anonymous wrote:
    The sao knew what was going on all those years and did nothIng.
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 4:54 PM two who know wrote:
    know more than a few who would join the picket
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 5:00 PM reality check wrote:
    I think he's like 60... he's definitely younger than Satz.
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 6:15 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Bogey is 69yrs
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 6:26 PM JoeShmoe wrote:
    You need to show empathy, after all the deaths in her family clouded her judgment and caused her inability to remember the texts and calls to her ASA boyfriend. That poor schmuck got hosed, big time.

    $100.00 says she doesn't lose her ticket to practice. A little vacation? At the most.
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 6:44 PM To Shmoe wrote:
    How many Shmoes had death in their families and she didn't give a rip at mitigation time?

    She's the one eating crow this time. 5 year susp as a PRR after she ran from the JQC.
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 7:14 PM FLORIDA U KNOW THIS COURT wrote:
    FLORIDA U KNOW THIS COURT - IS INCOMPETENT INEPT & CORRUPT! - FUKTHISCOURT.COM

    EMPATHY!!! BOLONEY!!!
    SHE HAD EVERY RIGHT TO DISCLOSE AND NOT HIDE SUCH FACTS

    SOME OF THE WITNESSES & SUPPORTERS, FOR BOTH LAURA WATSON AND ANNA GARDINER
    INCLUDING
    JOHN "JACK" P SEILER
    JUDGE DALE ROSS WHOSE NAME IS NOT RECOGNIZED BY THE FLORIDA BAR AND HAS MANY ALIASES
    TAMARA RIMES
    MICHAEL G AHEARN, ESQ.
    FORMER JUDGE JAY SPECHLER
    FORMER CHIEF JUDGE VICTOR TOBIN
    JUDGE CHARLIE GREENE
    JUDGE MARK SPEISER
    CURRENT CHIEF JUDGE PETER WEINSTEIN
    JUDGE MARC GOLD
    AND OTHERS KNEW OF THE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN MY CASE AND FAILED TO DISCLOSE SUCH INFORMATION TO ME
    THAT WAS NOT AN OPTION BUT REQUIRED UNDER FEDERAL LAW AS WAS INDICATED IN DOCUMENT
    WWW.SCRIBD.COM/DOC/61090995 (THE PARTIES CONFLICTS OF INTEREST) AND WAS TAKEN DOWN AT THE REQUEST OF MICHAEL G AHEARN, ESQ., WITH ABOUT 30 OTHER DOCUMENTS ON SCRIBD AND NUMEROUS OTHER PHOTOS ON FLICKR IN 2 ACCOUNTS INCLUDING HIS PICTURE WITH JOHN "JACK" P SEILER ESQ., & MAYOR OF FORT LAUDERDALE FLORIDA

    www.michaelgahearnesq.com
    www.michaelgahearn.com

    www.twitter.com/i/#!/fukthiscourt/media/slideshow?url=pic.twitter.com%2FPi7tfRLS

    I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY AND HAVE BEEN TOLD I DO NOT KNOW THE LAW...BUT HAVE LISTENED TO THE PEOPLE INVOLVED IN MY CASE,
    MAKE JUDICIAL HAY, THROUGH JUDICIAL BULL, AND WATCHED THE JUDICIAL DANCE

    JUDGE DAVID CROW MUST/SHOULD RECOMMEND THAT ANNA GARDINER BE DISBARRED AND THAT SHE FORFEIT ANY PENSION DUE

    THE ROLE OF A JUDGE SHOULD BE RESPECTED NOT JUST FROM THE LITIGANTS BEFORE THEM BUT FROM THE PEOPLE WHO WEAR JUDICIAL ROBES. IT CANNOT AND SHOULD NOT BE ONE SIDED.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SpubT384Us&feature=plcp

    FUKTHISCOURT.COM
    PART OF THE FUK (FLORIDA U KNOW) NETWORK OF SITES
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 8:22 PM Anonymous wrote:
    And all Bogey's horses and all Bogey's men, couldn't put poor little Ana back together again.
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 8:28 PM Anonymous wrote:
    PURVEYORS OF FRAUD, DECEIT & DISGRACE

    BOGEY'S DEFENSE OF ANNA GARDINER IS JUST PLAIN "BOGUS"
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 8:43 PM Case Counting Ana wrote:
    I wonder if Judge Crow's case count is more important to him than justice? I seriously doubt it, but he sure is lucky he's not being judged by Judge Gardiner. All she cared about was having the lowest case count. Too bad Judge Crow didn't decide to swear in three jury panels while simultaneously hearing the character witnesses spout off. Or too bad he didn't tell her she could be disbarred for life if she went to trial with a wicked smile on his face right before things got under way.
    Reply to this
  • 12/2/2012 9:38 PM JoeShmoe wrote:
    To Shmoe:

    I was being sarcastic. I left the friendly confines of Broward years ago to ply my trade in Miami Dade. Unlike most, I moved south instead of north.

    As sarcastic as I was being, I really don't think she will lose her ticket to practice. Something smells bad about this prosecution; it seems almost as if there is some sort of plea deal in place and that Bogey agreed to put his client on the stand as a part of the deal. From what I read, the prosecutor didn't make AG's life miserable, nor did he really go after her about her lying about the texts and calls.

    Again, I say she will get a vacation but in no way will she be permanently disbarred.
    Reply to this
  • 12/3/2012 1:45 PM rukidding wrote:
    short answer--yes I can provide proof--proof was provided to the JQC and the bar prosecutor andall of it ignored. so who are you that wants to see it and what would you do if and when you got it. And as usual--as an apparently consistant typical misdirecting suppoter, asking the wrong questions, you totally ignored the issue--harmfulness relative to her ruling is not the issue--it is irrelevant--the fact she concealed it IS the issue--dishonesty, failure to disclose and then lying to the JQC about her knowledge is--where the hell are you from that you won't discuss apples to apples--do you think that the rest of us are that stupid or are you just not smart enough to know how transparent and stupid you are? Sociopths are sociopaths--she is a black widow sociopath who is also a psychopath becauww she not only has no remorse, byt enjoys the illegal pain and torture she dished out, and that was since 1998 when she took the bench--looong before
    ROC court. that penchance for torture is reasonably WHY they gave her ROC court to increase her orgasmic lust to give out pain.
    Reply to this
  • 1/5/2013 8:34 PM rukidding wrote:
    Thanks for the brilliant update--I was not aware that she initially took the bench in ROC court in 1998 where the sentencing "is a bit tougher." That certainly explains why she could refuse to correct unstatutory illegal sentences upon 3.800(a)appeal--the law does not apply to equally to these petitioners because they lose their right to due process and equal protection of the laws prohibiting it. So what law firm or dirty cop organization do you work for? I can show you the evidence, but somehow i really doubt it matters to you or you would take any action when proved to you.
    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 3
Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.